[iccrg] Re: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-irtf-iccrg-rledbat-10
Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> Fri, 21 February 2025 13:19 UTC
Return-Path: <csp@csperkins.org>
X-Original-To: iccrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iccrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 236FDC151089; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 05:19:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=csperkins.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lcEzgwTuUflc; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 05:19:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.mythic-beasts.com (mx1.mythic-beasts.com [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:86:1000:0:2:1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44867C1D6215; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 05:19:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=csperkins.org; s=mythic-beasts-k1; h=Date:Subject:To:From; bh=6yxbQyNigfv3mb+2Mfjzldwb87S1GUFZpZ808NUvVbg=; b=DQPwhNNNZpWUiFvIFDZHTd2EVe v6SaJaRTG1dHnJat204Jx7NxF82PRIrlufDQwZdOmWtqSrVurYVHPkYPrKaPLbV5EW0byhuIeDyiW PFes72EDuwFCW117sJYrsWeRkG0TkJdifc/5PDH5DjpRqlTKWMHBngUA/4KRCaZXrCtizxrh1qYKD yTWSdOFPX47S8zXnlAujBrH6Z+LjMXqpZQP/IP2qyAQBJIh5aAlpsBvhs0Yy7xl85hOoA5yGUpIcw RPKhrhnlqEu805mD5SyIgHRJC3/BXk0lId+u67j5dfgTTnAcmQV+HRlQtZqn4oa0kmpZXI84wBxVl 094HGATw==;
Received: by mailhub-cam-d.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <csp@csperkins.org>) id 1tlSwY-00GfA4-5e; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:19:50 +0000
From: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
To: iccrg-chairs@ietf.org, draft-irtf-iccrg-rledbat@ietf.org, iccrg IRTF list <iccrg@irtf.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:19:48 +0000
X-Mailer: MailMate (2.0r6222)
Message-ID: <852FBC47-9E38-49EB-A41E-5B38AC39B30E@csperkins.org>
In-Reply-To: <174007793783.1943544.15571195133099404649@dt-datatracker-75c44cbbdf-pxnd6>
References: <174007793783.1943544.15571195133099404649@dt-datatracker-75c44cbbdf-pxnd6>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; markup="markdown"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 24
Message-ID-Hash: ULWC73CJ2FBXVEFAD5P3EFQDNEYHL3LS
X-Message-ID-Hash: ULWC73CJ2FBXVEFAD5P3EFQDNEYHL3LS
X-MailFrom: csp@csperkins.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-iccrg.irtf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Internet Research Steering Group <irsg@irtf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [iccrg] Re: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-irtf-iccrg-rledbat-10
List-Id: "Discussions of Internet Congestion Control Research Group (ICCRG)" <iccrg.irtf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iccrg/suXcuggYVdXO1f17f9TkJ_0h44E>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iccrg>
List-Help: <mailto:iccrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:iccrg-owner@irtf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:iccrg@irtf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:iccrg-join@irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iccrg-leave@irtf.org>
Thank you to the IESG for their review. There are no IESG comments to address in the datatracker, and I am not aware of any other outstanding issues, so I will now send this draft to the RFC Editor for publication. Colin On 20 Feb 2025, at 18:58, The IESG wrote: > The IESG has completed a review of draft-irtf-iccrg-rledbat-10 consistent > with RFC5742. > > The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'rLEDBAT: receiver-driven Low > Extra Delay Background Transport for TCP' <draft-irtf-iccrg-rledbat-10.txt> > as an Experimental RFC. > > The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in CCWG, > but this relationship does not prevent publishing. > > The IESG would also like the IRTF to review the comments in the datatracker > related to this document and determine whether or not they merit > incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the ballot and > the history log. > > The IESG review is documented at: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-irtf-iccrg-rledbat/ > > A URL of the reviewed Internet-Draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-iccrg-rledbat/ > > The process for such documents is described in RFC 5743 > > Thank you, > > The IESG Secretary
- [iccrg] Re: Results of IETF-conflict review for d… Colin Perkins