Re: [Ice] ICE session at Prague IETF

I left some comments on them.  I agree that a few could use a double check
to make sure they are equivalent.  And a few are somewhat non-editorial and
should get confirmation.

But the "offline?" one I don't understand.  It seems like I didn't change
anything except make it shorter.

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 8:47 AM Ari Keränen <ari.keranen@ericsson.com>
wrote:

> I marked set of changes in the P38 with "for IETF 99 session":
> https://github.com/ice-wg/rfc5245bis/pull/38/files
>
> I believe these changes in particular would benefit from few extra pair of
> eyes to see that we did not cause unintentional side effects with these
> changes.
>
> In particular one of them is quite substantial (look for "Need to take
> off-line?" comment).
>
>
> Cheers,
> Ari
>
> > On 17 Jul 2017, at 15.13, Ari Keränen <ari.keranen@ericsson.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Our goal for the ICE WG session in Prague IETF meeting is to resolve
> remaining comments on ICE-bis to extent that we can start WGLC after the
> meeting.
> >
> > The plan is to get consensus on the changes proposed in the PRs in the
> Github:
> > https://github.com/ice-wg/rfc5245bis/pulls
> > (note that PR #38 is a subset of #35)
> >
> > Would be great if you can have a look and comment PRs before the
> meeting. Issues that seem to require more review / hammering for consensus,
> we'll take during the f2f meeting. Including editorial fixes that have a
> risk of unintentionally changing behavior. For this session, it would be
> important to have people joining who are familiar with the specification
> and can comment whether the proposed fixes cause unintentional side effects.
> >
> > Peter Thatcher will unfortunately not be in Prague in person, but
> Flemming Andreasen volunteered to co-chair the ICE WG session. Thank you
> Flemming!
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Ari
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ice mailing list
> > Ice@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ice
>
>