IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ice] [rtcweb] [clue] ICE, ICE-bis, and Cluster 238

Nils Ohlmeier <nohlmeier@mozilla.com> Fri, 07 September 2018 20:01 UTC

Return-Path: <nohlmeier@mozilla.com>
X-Original-To: ice@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ice@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1807D130DDB for <ice@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Sep 2018 13:01:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mozilla.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b7FBruOxRjuV for <ice@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Sep 2018 13:01:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42a.google.com (mail-pf1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25F6912008A for <ice@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Sep 2018 13:01:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id k21-v6so7484938pff.11 for <ice@ietf.org>; Fri, 07 Sep 2018 13:01:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mozilla.com; s=google; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=5+l+h4Kkb9SvkyUAxZa29pzTRhiJ6ES5UqOqrFmyfrQ=; b=YuXkCpWuQ0LpDcY/Ls6LsVxH3ml+gY3nPiWzqjc3iV3j21hWmWmEbBQunyOa9XJz/x 7EHAm5KzMmiDHcUqm5ai0G9PVh9GXNJRcwyyfNuynTRIHYOXMnQT6BVrmXhzf2SMWsJ2 fCei3opLMIFQLD9P5uxD1r7D2Kk4lv1iCwBFc=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=5+l+h4Kkb9SvkyUAxZa29pzTRhiJ6ES5UqOqrFmyfrQ=; b=ZhVM8phOztG429x2PPwBGrmpGtSbylUDVlSgRfBy2Z+jFzgpasQGfuMEpdWAVRohWX jks0hTyXrvxKkbRcfwdVQ413bBjP3Mj8uhaM97vzghke9YzrDTszDjU+rXzWxFycRFeY Xv38LTVr7EI/MoCm6WeiVz18mvvGJNlHxg9EMabOMm8fVhA+UOwzv4ESAr5b7OqpINzb V2Dkg26MbrOtRAXUC2kEKwAfF9c/wcdZzB7lrxEwODpxvf1HXZG8O9vzP5WA3bx29Bei KdLdfHGrTx7Q69S6zqtIxEwTmxYG4IYbQ2c22IDk20doCI3dNOTXOqrDE/Mz1Hgdeaj+ JV+A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51A0ItaKhcYeoBQ7sIOqOU2aEIaHfpeZbKS5a+Lmo8zhpXXW+l5c jBFQ84pwdidOx9jstJQ4lhPJRA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0Vdac4HoWm0BMwrYwJK58TNRCiUxJTPzHLab/USUOyFbz7163dgZ3BRe2oN6IFbyXWc6W+Dqt0g==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:6711:: with SMTP id b17-v6mr10456115pfc.243.1536350473636; Fri, 07 Sep 2018 13:01:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:4600:3f31:f1b4:fa2c:dab4:bde9? ([2601:647:4600:3f31:f1b4:fa2c:dab4:bde9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c78-v6sm12260430pfc.188.2018.09.07.13.01.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 07 Sep 2018 13:01:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: Nils Ohlmeier <nohlmeier@mozilla.com>
Message-Id: <81680B8E-5F4D-4146-851A-36649E1AAAA2@mozilla.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D0D594AE-AECF-4650-B2FA-A33012ACD88E"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2018 13:01:09 -0700
In-Reply-To: <7D1A35C5-FF09-4F93-ABA8-74D877952EF0@iii.ca>
Cc: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art@ietf.org>, RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "clue@ietf.org" <clue@ietf.org>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>, "ice@ietf.org" <ice@ietf.org>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
References: <15d3b114-5c04-61c4-8a62-61d8a414143d@nostrum.com> <7D1A35C5-FF09-4F93-ABA8-74D877952EF0@iii.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ice/DTyiWk9_H9B6GMLplE5vhUWlLA4>
Subject: Re: [Ice] [rtcweb] [clue] ICE, ICE-bis, and Cluster 238
X-BeenThere: ice@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interactive Connectivity Establishment \(ICE\)" <ice.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ice>, <mailto:ice-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ice/>
List-Post: <mailto:ice@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ice-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ice>, <mailto:ice-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2018 20:01:17 -0000


> On Sep 6, 2018, at 13:24, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> wrote:
> 
> 
> Cisco has implemented stuff that is WebRTC 1.0 compliant without this change. These gratuitous changes, years after the implementation were coded, with no real benefit will ensure that we are not and will not become compliant with the RFC. It's unlikely we will upgrade to the new ICE until it has real befits. It is doubtful Justin will want to implement the 8445 mechanisms of supporting both new and old ICE. Instead, we will move to say "works with Browser X version Y or later.”

Obviously I’m not Justin.
But the current plan for Firefox is to implement support for 8845 some time in 2019 and then have support for 5245 and 8845 going forward.

Best regards
  Nils Ohlmeier

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email