[icnrg] IRTF Chair review of draft-irtf-icnrg-ccnx-timetlv-01

Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> Tue, 06 December 2022 23:03 UTC

Return-Path: <csp@csperkins.org>
X-Original-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B732EC1516E8 for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 15:03:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.395
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.395 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=csperkins.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RG-RUFAhYWm0 for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 15:03:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.mythic-beasts.com (mx1.mythic-beasts.com [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:86:1000:0:2:1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46988C1516F3 for <icnrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 15:03:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=csperkins.org; s=mythic-beasts-k1; h=Date:Subject:To:From; bh=TJsyIXyYvpK2LCY3R3yJPS1B4IJjBeqQJEHrMdQbVHU=; b=cMZjz0de26uJxJan2aNGGi/FZy jOJimroDW999TkonFcVylohePVISaKN5evuewtZKKAcPXj4i4V/ZZKW1n2mO5qeuFCl6+uFHfUUoM 72U5ASzWuF2nt42/vx7iZ4xnCrNNKmNbykBNcMejT6caFGU18CiioDi6BliDQp0xrtVnn8Jz8RcF9 zvo0NG3PwYEid7/iBWOdVy9i5o98VbpXYIUM6rUDwtpkBNNr+K2n3U07XxWyVLJSJSsxTLBXCiH0e 6gqPWlRO+m/Vzfyrbosx178stfDqNCAxfTpfsY0gdxTL8j0vzNzhjVFWB5Wg1WU6cFuMA3bWchTGP p5XjOazw==;
Received: from [81.187.2.149] (port=35186 helo=[192.168.0.72]) by mailhub-cam-d.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <csp@csperkins.org>) id 1p2gxo-00GHsF-44; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 23:03:00 +0000
From: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
To: draft-irtf-icnrg-ccnx-timetlv@ietf.org, icnrg-chairs@ietf.org
Cc: ICNRG <icnrg@irtf.org>
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2022 23:02:53 +0000
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5929)
Message-ID: <68FDE7B4-B03E-4540-BA57-60BA8D361D93@csperkins.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_D664F486-73B5-4F57-A62F-83BE0C2607E0_="
X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/icnrg/-R7swIp5Ch8HD7cvGNy8J3o_3FE>
Subject: [icnrg] IRTF Chair review of draft-irtf-icnrg-ccnx-timetlv-01
X-BeenThere: icnrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Information-Centric Networking research group discussion list <icnrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/icnrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:icnrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2022 23:03:07 -0000

The ICNRG chairs have requested that draft-irtf-icnrg-ccnx-timetlv-01 be 
published as an RFC on the IRTF stream. The IRTF publication process is 
described in RFC 5743, and comprises a review by the IRSG to ensure 
technical and editorial quality, followed by a check by the IESG to 
ensure the work does not conflict with IETF standards activities.

As IRTF Chair, I perform an initial review of all drafts submitted for 
publication on the IRTF stream before sending them for detailed review 
by the IRSG. This note provides my review comments, for discussion.

Authors, please can you also respond to this message to confirm that all 
necessary IPR disclosures, as described on 
https://irtf.org/policies/ipr, have been made?

Result: Almost ready

RFC 5743 compliance: The draft follows the guidelines in RFC 5743


Comments:

* The IANA will likely want explicit instructions for what changes 
should be made, and to what registries. The IANA Considerations section 
may need to be expanded.

* Should the CCNx RFCs be normative references?

* The draft is marked as Experimental, but does not say what experiment 
is being conducted. Is the experiment around the utility of this compact 
time encoding, or is it part of a larger experimental deployment of 
CCNx, or is it something else? How does this draft help advance that 
experiment? How is success to be determined?

Regards,
Colin


-- 
Colin Perkins
https://csperkins.org/