Re: [icnrg] Review of ICN Terminology document (draft-wissingh-icnrg-terminology-01)
"David Oran" <daveoran@orandom.net> Wed, 24 May 2017 17:08 UTC
Return-Path: <daveoran@orandom.net>
X-Original-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FBDF12EB57 for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 May 2017 10:08:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1bFme24CE454 for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 May 2017 10:08:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spark.crystalorb.net (spark.crystalorb.net [IPv6:2607:fca8:1530::c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EBFB129AEA for <icnrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 24 May 2017 10:08:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.15.129] (c-73-149-20-147.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [73.149.20.147]) (authenticated bits=0) by spark.crystalorb.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4+deb7u1) with ESMTP id v4OH8ebZ009720 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 24 May 2017 10:08:43 -0700
From: David Oran <daveoran@orandom.net>
To: "Wissingh, B.F." <bastiaan.wissingh@tno.nl>
Cc: "icnrg@irtf.org" <icnrg@irtf.org>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 13:08:39 -0400
Message-ID: <860B46EC-D3DD-4F60-A4FE-9EA65BEBDBAD@orandom.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_MailMate_1BE78736-A3FC-44A4-9AC7-2985065DF452_="
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.6r5372)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/icnrg/5uO_IUpXsY0li4ezYHvqeWlBD2M>
Subject: Re: [icnrg] Review of ICN Terminology document (draft-wissingh-icnrg-terminology-01)
X-BeenThere: icnrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Information-Centric Networking research group discussion list <icnrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/icnrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:icnrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 17:08:47 -0000
I was starting to review a couple of ICNRG current drafts, and saw that the term “location” is used a lot, partly to distinguish ICN from host-centric designs that name things based on their “location”. I then peeked into the terminology draft and didn’t find a definition of “location”. While adding this might re-open some tricky conversations about topologically-sensitive names, name resolution between “location independent” and “location dependent” names etc. I think we are on balance better off by having an agreed definition of “location” in the context of ICN than waffling and not defining it. What do folks think? DaveO
_______________________________________________ icnrg mailing list icnrg@irtf.org https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg
- [icnrg] Review of ICN Terminology document (draft… Rahman, Akbar
- Re: [icnrg] Review of ICN Terminology document (d… Wissingh, B.F. (Bastiaan)
- Re: [icnrg] Review of ICN Terminology document (d… David Oran
- Re: [icnrg] Review of ICN Terminology document (d… Ravi Ravindran
- Re: [icnrg] Review of ICN Terminology document (d… David Oran
- Re: [icnrg] Review of ICN Terminology document (d… Ravi Ravindran