[icnrg] draft-irtf-icnrg-scenarios and draft-irtf-icnrg-evaluation-methodology
Konstantinos Pentikousis <k.pentikousis@eict.de> Mon, 21 October 2013 12:12 UTC
Return-Path: <k.pentikousis@eict.de>
X-Original-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B7EF11E83A0 for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 05:12:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.85
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.85 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.400, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0mYyXtgtW5FQ for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 05:12:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.eict.de (mx2.eict.de [212.91.241.168]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A7911E84CE for <icnrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 05:12:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eict.de (mx1 [172.16.6.1]) by mx2.eict.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F9D31FF54 for <icnrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 14:11:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from sbs2008.eict.local (sbs2008.intern.eict.de [192.168.2.11]) by mail.eict.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E728337819D for <icnrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 14:11:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from SBS2008.eict.local ([fe80::2051:ef24:c7c9:f298]) by SBS2008.eict.local ([fe80::2051:ef24:c7c9:f298%13]) with mapi; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 14:11:58 +0200
From: Konstantinos Pentikousis <k.pentikousis@eict.de>
To: "icnrg@irtf.org" <icnrg@irtf.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 14:11:56 +0200
Thread-Topic: draft-irtf-icnrg-scenarios and draft-irtf-icnrg-evaluation-methodology
Thread-Index: Ac7OVry40iSamu0eQ5GpawFXZREcfg==
Message-ID: <0C7EDCF89AB9E2478B5D010026CFF4AEA10BFCB859@SBS2008.eict.local>
Accept-Language: en-US, de-DE
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US, de-DE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [icnrg] draft-irtf-icnrg-scenarios and draft-irtf-icnrg-evaluation-methodology
X-BeenThere: icnrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Information-Centric Networking research group discussion list <icnrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/icnrg>
List-Post: <mailto:icnrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:12:07 -0000
Dear all, We have concluded the split of draft-pentikousis-icn-scenarios-04 into one draft that details scenarios based on the peer-reviewed ICN literature (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-scenarios/) and another that deals with evaluation methodology (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-evaluation-methodology/), as we agreed in Berlin. We're looking forward to your comments/suggestions/nits/text contributions. Best regards, Kostas
- [icnrg] draft-irtf-icnrg-scenarios and draft-irtf… Konstantinos Pentikousis