Re: [icnrg] ICN Baseline Scenarios revised
sitaraman@nmsworks.co.in Fri, 01 February 2013 13:18 UTC
Return-Path: <sitaraman@nmsworks.co.in>
X-Original-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AB5A21F882A for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 05:18:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.535
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.535 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.136, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_110=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_19=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EE4UujXdjO+b for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 05:18:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from indlocal.nmsworks.co.in (nmsworks.co.in [14.140.238.3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8524321F8A61 for <icnrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 05:18:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from www.nmsworks.co.in (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by indlocal.nmsworks.co.in (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r11DG9it025748; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 18:46:09 +0530
Received: from 101.62.96.39 (SquirrelMail authenticated user sitaraman) by www.nmsworks.co.in with HTTP; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 18:46:09 +0530 (IST)
Message-ID: <49507.101.62.96.39.1359724569.squirrel@www.nmsworks.co.in>
In-Reply-To: <8D38716F0C1A444BA0CD7E96454366C23A515EAE@szxeml545-mbx.china.huawei.c om>
References: <8D38716F0C1A444BA0CD7E96454366C23A515EAE@szxeml545-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 18:46:09 +0530
From: sitaraman@nmsworks.co.in
To: Konstantinos Pentikousis <k.pentikousis@huawei.com>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
X-NMSWorks-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-NMSWorks-MailScanner-ID: r11DG9it025748
X-NMSWorks-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-NMSWorks-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-2.9, required 4, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00, BAYES_00 -1.90)
X-NMSWorks-MailScanner-From: sitaraman@nmsworks.co.in
Cc: Daniel Corujo <dcorujo@av.it.pt>, "g.boggia@poliba.it" <g.boggia@poliba.it>, Börje Ohlman <borje.ohlman@ericsson.com>, "icnrg@irtf.org" <icnrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [icnrg] ICN Baseline Scenarios revised
X-BeenThere: icnrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Information-Centric Networking research group discussion list <icnrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/icnrg>
List-Post: <mailto:icnrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 13:18:39 -0000
Hi Kostas, Is something along the following lines been studied in the literature that has been referred to in the document....pointers to the same is much appreciated... Networks, host based, can be modelled clearly as graphs with the hosts forming the nodes and the links (logical and physical) as connecting edges. The edges here represent data connectivity. Considering Information, we can model Information and its distribution as a graph. Here, the nodes would represent Information Entities. There are, at least, two types of relations between Information entities: a)Causality (of Semantics?) and b)Similarity. Causality could be modelled as directed edges. Similarity either by edges weight (for fine grained continuous characterisation) or Node colors (limited and coarse grained). Now, perhaps with the help of Ontologists, classify information into these graphs. Assuming for the moment location independence of the two types of nodes (all information is to be accessible everywhere), we could address the possibly more complicated constrained problem by relaxing this constraint later...look to mathematicians to address problem of optimally overlaying the two types of graph (with respect to bandwidth contention, latency, rendundancy and such...). Once we face the inevitable temporal (scheduling) and spatial(mobile) shifts of access to these information we would need feedback control to automatically overlay the graphs now that there are constraint points on the overlap... Thanks Sitaraman Sitaraman > Dear All, > > We have updated the scenarios draft. You can find the new version at > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-pentikousis-icn-scenarios > > The draft has been edited throughout, and it now includes two new sections > on ICN for "Internet of Things" and "Smart City". I updated the document > wiki page accordingly > (http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/irtf/trac/wiki/IcnBaselineScenarios). > > We're looking forward to your comments and text contributions. > > Best regards, > > Kostas > > > _______________________________________________ > icnrg mailing list > icnrg@irtf.org > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
- [icnrg] ICN Baseline Scenarios revised Konstantinos Pentikousis
- Re: [icnrg] ICN Baseline Scenarios revised sitaraman
- Re: [icnrg] ICN Baseline Scenarios revised sitaraman
- Re: [icnrg] ICN Baseline Scenarios revised Konstantinos Pentikousis
- Re: [icnrg] ICN Baseline Scenarios revised sitaraman
- [icnrg] ICN Baseline Scenarios revised Konstantinos Pentikousis
- [icnrg] ICN Baseline Scenarios revised Konstantinos Pentikousis