[icnrg] Vincent Roca's No Objection on draft-irtf-icnrg-ccninfo-10: (with COMMENT)

Vincent Roca via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 29 June 2022 06:29 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: icnrg@irtf.org
Delivered-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE77C15A72A; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 23:29:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Vincent Roca via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IRSG <irsg@irtf.org>
Cc: draft-irtf-icnrg-ccninfo@ietf.org, icnrg-chairs@ietf.org, icnrg@irtf.org, daveoran@orandom.net, daveoran@orandom.net
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 8.5.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Vincent Roca <vincent.roca@inrialpes.fr>
Message-ID: <165648416118.26119.135377741531240328@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 23:29:21 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/icnrg/cXkszSjnDgmrP_XKzGM7dzQtQJA>
Subject: [icnrg] Vincent Roca's No Objection on draft-irtf-icnrg-ccninfo-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: icnrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: Information-Centric Networking research group discussion list <icnrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/icnrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:icnrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 06:29:21 -0000

Vincent Roca has entered the following ballot position for
draft-irtf-icnrg-ccninfo-10: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


I gave a quick look at the Security Considerations section that seems of good
quality. Given that this tool opens the door to a large set of new security and
privacy risks, this is clearly required. I hope the SecDir review will go
through all of this more carefully than I did.