[icnrg] CCNx URI scheme RFC
<Marc.Mosko@parc.com> Wed, 05 October 2016 01:52 UTC
Return-Path: <Marc.Mosko@parc.com>
X-Original-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14309129447 for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 18:52:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OXOvoSdcleiU for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 18:52:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.parc.xerox.com (alpha.Xerox.COM [13.1.64.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D82B128E18 for <icnrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 18:52:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.parc.xerox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3EB26C009F for <icnrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 18:51:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at newalpha.parc.com
Received: from smtp.parc.xerox.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.parc.xerox.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jp8j3hanSpCJ for <icnrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 18:51:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exchangehub.parc.xerox.com (vertigo.parc.xerox.com [13.2.13.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.parc.xerox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79D0B6C00A4 for <icnrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 18:51:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from E2010DAG5.corp.ad.parc.com ([fe80::3d0b:7158:aec4:e05e]) by vertigo.corp.ad.parc.com ([fe80::606e:47ce:f5e2:fe3a%14]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 18:52:20 -0700
From: Marc.Mosko@parc.com
To: icnrg@irtf.org
Thread-Topic: CCNx URI scheme RFC
Thread-Index: AQHSHqsb+3Jh/mo8506ubupbTTNe3w==
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 01:52:19 +0000
Message-ID: <E2B6A156-C81D-417D-A3DF-02AF09BCFAF6@parc.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [210.242.154.25]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_E2B6A156C81D417DA3DF02AF09BCFAF6parccom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/icnrg/dnIUydcPKHPVBy_QdBuiwqxidao>
Subject: [icnrg] CCNx URI scheme RFC
X-BeenThere: icnrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Information-Centric Networking research group discussion list <icnrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/icnrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:icnrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 01:52:04 -0000
All, The draft draft-mosko-icnrg-ccnxurischeme-01 (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mosko-icnrg-ccnxurischeme/) is coming up on expiration again. I would like to get this adopted as a RG draft and moved towards Experimental status so we can then get it registered as an official URI scheme and point to the RFC spec. Marc
- [icnrg] CCNx URI scheme RFC Marc.Mosko
- Re: [icnrg] CCNx URI scheme RFC Luca Muscariello