Re: [icnrg] Link to our comprehensive survey on ICN Security, Privacy, and Access Control.

"Satyajayant \"Jay\" Misra" <misra@cs.nmsu.edu> Fri, 11 March 2016 11:34 UTC

Return-Path: <misra@cs.nmsu.edu>
X-Original-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28D0312D66E for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 03:34:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bRJfBi5mPeGN for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 03:34:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp2.nmsu.edu (smtp2.nmsu.edu [128.123.34.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DEDE12D65E for <icnrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 03:34:08 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2DPAQDErOJW/xpAe4BeFoN6bbosAQ2BbRcKhW4CgWEUAQEBAQEBAYELhEEBAQEDAQEBARULJiULBQsLDgoCAiMDAgInHxEGExSICBatboslg3sBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEVfIcPCIJHhBQkgko4ExiBDwWOKokZAYVsiXNLg32DAyOFMIczhz4eAQGCcoFUSgGJFYE7AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,320,1455001200"; d="scan'208";a="113454147"
X-IronPort-Nmsu-Outbound: mailrelay2.nmsu.edu 03/11/16 04:34:07
Received: from [10.0.1.5] (c-76-113-44-120.hsd1.nm.comcast.net [76.113.44.120]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mailsec.cs.nmsu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1F45A22AC; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 04:34:07 -0700 (MST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: "Satyajayant \"Jay\" Misra" <misra@cs.nmsu.edu>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13D15)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.WNT.2.00.1603110945580.3740@mw-PC>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 04:34:06 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9E8D5D97-25E8-4776-8B61-E531DD6F3B57@cs.nmsu.edu>
References: <6DDFC7E7-85F5-4E11-8B72-685223A87092@cs.nmsu.edu> <alpine.WNT.2.00.1603110945580.3740@mw-PC>
To: Matthias Waehlisch <m.waehlisch@fu-berlin.de>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/icnrg/mRm_cASkSR--VwGxC_6FpvTNBtM>
Cc: icnrg@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [icnrg] Link to our comprehensive survey on ICN Security, Privacy, and Access Control.
X-BeenThere: icnrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Information-Centric Networking research group discussion list <icnrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/icnrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:icnrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 11:34:10 -0000

Dear Matthias,

Many thanks for the information. We will incorporate them in the paper immediately. You should see it in the future version. Looking forward to more feedback.

With best regards,
Jay (Satyajayant) Misra
Associate Professor 
Computer Science
New Mexico State University
www.cs.nmsu.edu

> On Mar 11, 2016, at 3:49 AM, Matthias Waehlisch <m.waehlisch@fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> 
> Dear Jay,
> 
>  many thanks for sharing this huge amount of work!
> 
>  [Caveat: I didn't read the full survey yet. I will thus focus on the 
> part that is very well-known to me.]
> 
>  (1) The Backscatter paper [110] is incorrectly classified as "Other 
> General Contributions". This paper, including previous shorter versions 
> published at SIGCOMM'12, IFIP Networking'13, is one of the first 
> publications that extensively analyzed denial of service attacks (and 
> other attacks) on ICN/NDN.
> 
>  (2) Content poisoning attack is not limited to fake payload, I would 
> say. An attacker may also inject content to poison routes (also briefly 
> discussed in the Backscatter paper).
> 
>  (3) You might want to take a look into "Revisiting Countermeasures 
> Against NDN Interest Flooding" ICN'15.
> 
> 
> Cheers
>  matthias
> 
>> On Thu, 10 Mar 2016, Satyajayant Misra wrote:
>> 
>> Dear ICNRG Colleagues and Chairs, 
>> 
>> A lot of us have felt a need for a comprehensive survey on the state 
>> of the art in ICN Security, Privacy, and Access Control and 
>> outstanding challenges. In our group, we started working on a survey 
>> six months ago to fill this need. The survey is currently in 
>> submission in IEEE Communications on Surveys and Tutorials, but for 
>> the benefit of the community we have published it on arXiv.
>> 
>> Please find the link enclosed: http://arxiv.org/abs/1603.03409. 
>> 
>> We eagerly look forward to critical feedback from the community. 
>> Thanks in advance for weighing in.
>> 
>> With best regards, 
>> -Jay
>> 
>> --
>> Satyajayant “Jay” Misra
>> Associate Professor 
>> Computer Science Department
>> New Mexico State University
>> Homepage: http://www.cs.nmsu.edu/~misra
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> icnrg mailing list
>> icnrg@irtf.org
>> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg
> 
> 
> -- 
> Dr. Matthias Waehlisch
> .  Freie Universitaet Berlin, Inst. fuer Informatik, AG CST
> .  Takustr. 9, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
> .. mailto:m.waehlisch@fu-berlin.de .. http://www.inf.fu-berlin.de/~waehl
> :. Also: http://inet.haw-hamburg.de .. http://www.link-lab.net