IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Id-event] AD review of draft-ietf-secevent-http-poll-06

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Wed, 29 April 2020 23:20 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: id-event@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: id-event@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B6073A09C5; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 16:20:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Uf3wwWC6EXOJ; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 16:20:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 251263A09C0; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 16:20:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 03TNJxnh031024 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 29 Apr 2020 19:20:02 -0400
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 16:19:59 -0700
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: "Richard Backman, Annabelle" <richanna@amazon.com>
Cc: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>, "draft-ietf-secevent-http-poll.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-secevent-http-poll.all@ietf.org>, "id-event@ietf.org" <id-event@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20200429231959.GI27494@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <BY5PR00MB0676C7A40DF72E4FAA78B1E3F5AD0@BY5PR00MB0676.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <87C847B1-937A-4579-8B90-09F879A4DC05@amazon.com> <DM6PR00MB0684F15C85722E3EEDF59E76F5AD0@DM6PR00MB0684.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <14B055A2-A54A-4C21-A71C-125C3D508BBD@amazon.com> <2183F624-3C9B-4956-9E4B-FC26A0C22AC4@amazon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2183F624-3C9B-4956-9E4B-FC26A0C22AC4@amazon.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/id-event/5bewt8WKwXrnIPJOKVOKU5MVPv4>
Subject: Re: [Id-event] AD review of draft-ietf-secevent-http-poll-06
X-BeenThere: id-event@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A mailing list to discuss the potential solution for a common identity event messaging format and distribution system." <id-event.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/id-event>, <mailto:id-event-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/id-event/>
List-Post: <mailto:id-event@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:id-event-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/id-event>, <mailto:id-event-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 23:20:08 -0000

On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 11:13:15PM +0000, Richard Backman, Annabelle wrote:
> Despite some fun with gateway timeouts on the datatracker, both drafts are now published. __

I was fortunate enough to "only" have the usual slowness of response from
the datatracker; IETF LC has been requested for both.

Thanks for the updates!

-Ben

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email