[Ideas] some comments on the requirement draft
"Liubingyang (Bryan)" <liubingyang@huawei.com> Sun, 19 March 2017 07:10 UTC
Return-Path: <liubingyang@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 037B21201F8 for <ideas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 00:10:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iTSCf6qaVL_h for <ideas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 00:10:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5DD41200C1 for <ideas@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 00:10:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml703-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DJD72680; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 07:10:25 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SZXEMI403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.75.35) by lhreml703-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.44) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 07:10:24 +0000
Received: from SZXEMI508-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.10.152]) by SZXEMI403-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.83.65.55]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 15:10:19 +0800
From: "Liubingyang (Bryan)" <liubingyang@huawei.com>
To: "ideas@ietf.org" <ideas@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: some comments on the requirement draft
Thread-Index: AdKgfVaSvcPpAaRbRnOoqKqpjjIcOQ==
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 07:10:18 +0000
Message-ID: <C1CE72EE84AF224E94DA21AE134209EE010194C9@SZXEMI508-MBS.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.109.108.226]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C1CE72EE84AF224E94DA21AE134209EE010194C9SZXEMI508MBSchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A090201.58CE2EE1.00EC, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.10.152, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: a685056007ce1557e71e570480df5a84
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ideas/PDd5-m1vwMIjBRbXhpRpxcLehbA>
Subject: [Ideas] some comments on the requirement draft
X-BeenThere: ideas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions relating to the development, clarification, and implementation of control-plane infrastructures and functionalities in ID enabled networks." <ideas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ideas/>
List-Post: <mailto:ideas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 07:10:31 -0000
Thanks for the authors for the work. I think this doc is very important for specifying the difference between ideas/grids from related works. I suggest that in the next version, there should be a figure sketching the module structure of GRIDS, including the layers and interfaces between GRIDS-IS, GRIDS-MS, and GRIDS-SS, as well as the external service interfaces. One detail comment is that GRIDS-IS might not be a perfect naming, since it is "id service - id service". For REQ-MS-40, a companion requirement may be needed for authorization (like REQ-MS-30), which allows authorized client to update the access-control list. For REQ-IS-10, it is better to explicitly show that length and structure are two independent dimensions. I think "root-of-trust" is an important element, which need to appear in the next version. Best Bingyang
- [Ideas] some comments on the requirement draft Liubingyang (Bryan)
- Re: [Ideas] some comments on the requirement draft Alexander Clemm