IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: HIDDEN-USER

"Mark D. Baushke" <mdb@cisco.com> Thu, 13 August 1992 23:09 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01563; 13 Aug 92 19:09 EDT
Received: from NRI.NRI.Reston.Va.US by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id ab01559; 13 Aug 92 19:09 EDT
Received: from ietf.NRI.Reston.Va.US by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa21362; 13 Aug 92 19:10 EDT
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01554; 13 Aug 92 19:09 EDT
Received: from NRI.NRI.Reston.Va.US by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01550; 13 Aug 92 19:09 EDT
Received: from wolf.cisco.com by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa21357; 13 Aug 92 19:10 EDT
Received: from regal.cisco.com by wolf.cisco.com with TCP; Thu, 13 Aug 92 16:08:23 -0700
Message-Id: <9208132308.AA27714@wolf.cisco.com>
To: Peter Eriksson <pen@lysator.liu.se>
Cc: ident@NRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: HIDDEN-USER
Organization: cisco Systems Inc., Menlo Park, CA, USA
In-Reply-To: Mail from Peter Eriksson <pen@lysator.liu.se> dated Fri, 14 Aug 92 00:35:56 +0700 <CMM.0.90.0.713745356.pen@robin.lysator.liu.se>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 16:08:22 -0700
From: "Mark D. Baushke" <mdb@cisco.com>

On Fri, 14 Aug 92 0:35:56 MET DST, Peter Eriksson <pen@lysator.liu.se> said:

Peter> Alexander Dupuy writes:

> Is there anyone out there who still feels strongly that complete anonymity is
> ever necessary?  If not, I propose that HIDDEN-USER be dropped from the
> draft.

Peter> Yes, there is. I do feel that complete anonymity may be necessary.

I concur.

Peter> I think it is much better to have HIDDEN-USER in the draft, but
Peter> not enabled by default in the servers.

This sounds like a good approach to me.

	-- Mark

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email