Re: New Version - at last
"Mark D. Baushke" <mdb@cisco.com> Fri, 31 July 1992 18:52 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06464; 31 Jul 92 14:52 EDT
Received: from NRI.NRI.Reston.Va.US by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06460; 31 Jul 92 14:52 EDT
Received: from ietf.NRI.Reston.Va.US by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa27276; 31 Jul 92 14:53 EDT
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06453; 31 Jul 92 14:52 EDT
Received: from NRI.NRI.Reston.Va.US by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id ab06449; 31 Jul 92 14:52 EDT
Received: from wolf.cisco.com by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa27258; 31 Jul 92 14:52 EDT
Received: from regal.cisco.com by wolf.cisco.com with TCP; Fri, 31 Jul 92 11:52:38 -0700
Message-Id: <9207311852.AA13083@wolf.cisco.com>
To: Mike StJohns <stjohns@umd5.umd.edu>
Cc: ident@NRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: New Version - at last
Organization: cisco Systems Inc., Menlo Park, CA, USA
In-Reply-To: Mail from Mike StJohns <stjohns@umd5.umd.edu> dated Fri, 31 Jul 92 13:43:24 EDT <9207311743.AA12990@umd5.umd.edu>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 11:52:37 -0700
From: "Mark D. Baushke" <mdb@cisco.com>
Wordsmithing stuff.... beware, I am a poor speller. -- Mark | Network Working Group Mike StJohns | Request for Comments: DOD | Supersedes: RFC912, RFC931 August 1992 | | Identification Server | | | STATUS OF THIS MEMO | |... Looks ok to me. | | INTRODUCTION | |... Looks ok to me except you may wish to add 'aka "ident" server' to the list (see below). | | OVERVIEW | | This is a connection based application on TCP. A server listens | for TCP connections on TCP port 113 (decimal). Once a connection | is established, the server reads one line of data which specifies | the connection of interest. Use of the word 'one' implies that multiple queries are not allowed. I recommend changing 'one' to 'a'. | If it exists, the system dependent | user identifier of the connection of interest is sent out the | connection. This sentence is somewhat awkward. Perhaps: If it exists, the system dependent user identifier of the connection of interest is sent as the reply. would read better? | The server may then either shut the connection down or | it may continue to read/respond to multiple queries. | |... | | RESTRICTIONS | |... Looks ok to me. | | QUERY/RESPONSE FORMAT | |... | where <local-port> is the TCP port (decimal) on the target (where | the "ident" server is running) system, and <foreign-port> is the TCP You need another aka above or change '"ident" server' to one of the names listed above. | port (decimal) on the source (client) system. |... The rest of this section look ok to me. | | | RESPONSE TYPES | | A response can be one of two types: | | USERID | |... | indicate the character set of the identification string. If a | character set identifier is omitted, the identification string | is assumed to be in "US-ASCII". A reference to the RFC where "US-ASCII" is defined would be reasonable (RFC-1341) here. ... to be in "US-ASCII" (see RFC-1341 or its successors for a definition of "US-ASCII" | | Permitted operating system names and character set names are | specified in RFC-1060, "Assigned Numbers" or its successors. The latest "Assigned Numbers" is RFC-1340. Please use that instead of RFC-1060. | | [Note that "Assigned Numbers" does not currently list character | set names but should eventually include them both as a source | for this protocol and as the result of the work of the MIME | mail extensions working group.] This note is obsolete. RFC-1340 does list character set names now. |... The rest looks ok to me. | | ERROR | |... Look ok to me. | | FORMAL SYNTAX | |... The bnf looks ok to me. | Notes on Syntax: | |... | 5) The character sets and character set identifiers should map | directly to those specified and used by the MIME Mail | extensions. Character set identifiers only apply to the user | identification field - all other fields will be defined in and | must be sent as US-ASCII. I dislike the mention of MIME here. Now that the Assigned Number RFC has character sets, can we just reference that instead? Perhaps: 5) The character sets and character set identifiers should map directly to those defined or referenced by RFC-1340, "Assigned Numbers" or its successors. Character set identifiers only apply to the user identification field - all other fields will be defined in and must be sent as US-ASCII. would be a reasonable rewrite? |... | | Security Considerations: | |... | information returned may be completely erroneous and misleading. | | | The Identity Protocol is not intended as an authorization or access |... You are using two blank lines between these paragraphs where one would be sufficient. I have no problems with the text of the section. | | ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: | |... Looks ok to me. | |[end-of-document]
- Next version - Alternative 1 Mike StJohns
- Re: Next version - Alternative 1 Mark D. Baushke
- Re: Next version - Alternative 1 Mike StJohns
- Re: Alternative 2 Mark D. Baushke
- Re: Next version - Alternative 1 Peter Eriksson
- Re: Next version - Alternative 1 Mike StJohns
- Re: Next version - Alternative 1 Peter Eriksson
- Re: Next version - Alternative 1 Theodore Ts'o
- Re: Next version - Alternative 1 Peter Eriksson
- Re: Next version - Alternative 1 Christopher Davis
- Re: Next version - Alternative 1 Theodore Ts'o
- Re: New Version - at last Mark D. Baushke
- Re: Once more - Mark D. Baushke