Re: [idn] idn wg proposed agenda

["James Seng/Personal" <[e-mail]>]

draft-ietf-idn-step has been drop from the working group after AMC-ACE-Z
is decided as a choosen ACE. The topic on what ACE to use is as far as
the group concern is closed. You are beating a dead horse here.

If you want to be the first person to be revoked posting right in this
working group, you are very close to achieving that goal.

-James Seng

----- Original Message -----
From: "liana Ye" <[e-mail]>
To: <[e-mail]>
Cc: <[e-mail]>; <[e-mail]>
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 9:28 AM
Subject: Re: [idn] idn wg proposed agenda


> I'd like to raise another procedure issue:
> Who is quanified to support an I-D to be in the core
> discussion?
>
> For example, my draft-ieft-idn-step has 13 supporters
> including me. Among the 13 there are 4 active
> participants speakers on the list.  The rest choose
> to remain lurk now or not bother due to many
> reasons.  I used to work off line on this, and is
> discouraged to continue  working with people off
> line.
>
> While others were never posting any message,
> but it counted for voting.  To speak about reasonable
> judgement on who's opinion can be counted for
> support is too vage for me to follow.
> In my judgement, all the 13 are quanlified to support
> the draft.  Some people tell me, that they can not
> answer all the questions that may be raised, so
> they prefer to stay silent.   Can the group comes
> up with better guide lines?
>
> Liana
>
> On Wed, 05 Dec 2001 11:01:04 -0500 Marc Blanchet
> <[e-mail]> writes:
> > Hi,
> >  James and I are proposing this agenda for the wg. This is a first
> > version,
> > please sent your comments to james and I.
> > Because we are late, I sent it to [e-mail]. I'll update it
> > with your
> > comments.
> >
> > Marc.
> >
> > ==============================================
> > Proposed Agenda, v1.0
> >
> > IDN wg meeting
> > MONDAY, December 10, 2001
> > 1300-1500 Afternoon Sessions I
> > Grand D INT idn Internationalized Domain Name WG *
> >
> > Goal of this meeting:
> >  build concensus on the remaining items for the architecture
> >
> > Agenda
> >  1. wg documents status: 15 min.
> >
> >  2. draft-ietf-idn-lsb-ace-02.txt: 10 min.
> >   summary of wg electronic strawpoll and decision.
> >
> >  3. discussion on next steps for:
> >   draft-ietf-idn-jpchar-01.txt
> >   draft-ietf-idn-hangeulchar-00.txt
> >   draft-ietf-idn-tsconv-02.txt
> >
> >   TSCONV, Kenny Huang, 10 min.
> >   How to handle tsconv/jpchar/hangeulchar, To be confirmed, 10 min.
> >   Discussion and decision, 20 min.
> >
> >  4. draft-hall-dm-idns-00.txt
> >   discussion on next steps, 10 min.
> >
> >  5. WG next steps, 10 min.
> >
> >
> >
>