Re: [idn] Report from the ACE design team

Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net> Mon, 25 June 2001 20:06 UTC

Received: from psg.com (exim@psg.com [147.28.0.62]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id QAA25866 for <idn-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 16:06:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lserv by psg.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 15EcQO-0005uA-00 for idn-data@psg.com; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:53:32 -0700
Received: from 216-220-241-232.midmaine.com ([216.220.241.232] helo=nic-naa.net) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 15EcQN-0005u2-00 for idn@ops.ietf.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:53:31 -0700
Received: from nic-naa.net (localhost.nic-naa.net [127.0.0.1]) by nic-naa.net (8.11.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f5PJqAX14268; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:52:10 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from brunner@nic-naa.net)
Message-Id: <200106251952.f5PJqAX14268@nic-naa.net>
To: Marc Blanchet <Marc.Blanchet@viagenie.qc.ca>
cc: idn@ops.ietf.org, brunner@nic-naa.net
Subject: Re: [idn] Report from the ACE design team
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:55:10 EDT." <5.1.0.14.1.20010625133853.042afac8@mail.viagenie.qc.ca>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:52:10 -0400
From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Sender: owner-idn@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk

Marc,

Scott didn't actually use the word "testbed".

Let's leave that term, used as a synonym for "propriatary product", for
others in the marketing realm, and use it properly within the IETF for
activities consistent with our history.

There isn't a lot in propriatary product(s) to motivate real interest,
as few can bother to "interoperate" with pp(s) without standards, with
the notable exception of Micro$oft, which Veri$ign isn't.

While we're on the subject of predisposition towards dubious solutions,
could we _please_ loose the recommendation (lines 52 and 53) from the
requirements. (draft-ietf-idn-requirements-every-week-now.txt)

In section 1.4 a _laborious_ discussion of characters in the DNS can be
simplified at line 240. The protocol is UDP, and the appropriate unit is
bytes (see rfc768).

I'll have to stop here. More later.
Eric
no mention