IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [idn] draft-ietf-idn-requirements-07.txt

Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> Sat, 23 June 2001 20:51 UTC

Received: from psg.com (exim@psg.com [147.28.0.62]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id QAA17248 for <idn-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 16:51:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lserv by psg.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 15DsSx-000JFu-00 for idn-data@psg.com; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 11:49:07 -0700
Received: from mail.s.netic.de ([212.9.160.11] helo=mail.netic.de) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 15DsSw-000JFo-00 for idn@ops.ietf.org; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 11:49:06 -0700
Received: by mail.netic.de (Smail3.2.0.111/mail.s.netic.de) via LF.net GmbH Internet Services via remoteip 212.9.163.72 via remotehost mail.enyo.de with esmtp for psg.com id m15DsSp-001X21C; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 20:48:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.1.2] (helo=deneb.enyo.de ident=exim) by mail.enyo.de with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 15DsLl-0007K9-00; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 20:41:41 +0200
Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 3.12 #1) id 15Dsbo-0000oJ-00; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 20:58:16 +0200
To: Andrea Vine <avine@eng.sun.com>
Cc: Zita Wenzel <zita@ISI.EDU>, jseng@pobox.org.sg, idn@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [idn] draft-ietf-idn-requirements-07.txt
References: <200106192046.UAA12542@gin.isi.edu> <3B31373B.395B8642@eng.sun.com> <87elsbxzjl.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 20:58:16 +0200
In-Reply-To: <87elsbxzjl.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> (Florian Weimer's message of "23 Jun 2001 12:26:22 +0200")
Message-ID: <87hex7uipj.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
Lines: 18
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/20.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-idn@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk

Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> writes:

[A fullquote without any comment]

Sorry about that.  Of course, I didn't want to send this message.
It's strange that it went out because I killed the buffer which
contained it, at least I think so, and no Cc was placed in my outgoing
mail archive. *sigh*

Andrea Vine <avine@eng.sun.com> writes:

>    Quoted-Printable, BASE64, UTF-7 (defunct), (UTF-5, and RACE)."
> 
>   Is UTF-7 defunct, or deprecated?  Also, why are UTF-5 and RACE in parens?

Deprecated, I think.  For example, SAFT uses it, and some mail user
agents do as well.  By encoding UTF-16, UTF-7 can even handle the full
character range, however this double encoding seems hackish to me.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email