IETF Logo Mail Archive

Note: WG Process - Was Re: [idn] Traditional-simplified, yet again

"James Seng/Personal" <jseng@pobox.org.sg> Wed, 31 October 2001 02:04 UTC

Received: from psg.com (exim@psg.com [147.28.0.62]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA18613 for <idn-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 21:04:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: from lserv by psg.com with local (Exim 3.33 #1) id 15ykXn-0008wI-00 for idn-data@psg.com; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 17:51:51 -0800
Received: from mail.i-dns.net ([203.126.116.228]) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 15ykXl-0008wA-00 for idn@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 17:51:50 -0800
Received: from jamessonyvaio (unknown [203.126.116.227]) by mail.i-dns.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 054B9FFC30 for <idn@ops.ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 09:51:58 +0800 (SGT)
Message-ID: <01d701c161ae$97a21470$dd00a8c0@jamessonyvaio>
From: James Seng/Personal <jseng@pobox.org.sg>
To: idn@ops.ietf.org
References: <3BD556C6.6C49EF21@twnic.net.tw><20011024114321N.yone@nic.ad.jp> <01c801c15 c3d$d9a7ae50$4407e29f@deng> <20011024130954A.yone@nic.ad.jp> <024101c15c42$372e1b50$4407e29f@deng> <007a01c15f57$0f0cdfe0$1c01000a@jamessonyvaio> <003f01c15f5c$1d4e5f70$ec1bd9d2@temp> <001101c15f64$7eb3b780$1c01000a@jamessonyvaio> <016601c15f7d$14325c40$ec1bd9d2@temp> <005501c15f80$9dd52a10$1c01000a@jamessonyvaio> <000d01c15f81$5573d900$ec1bd9d2@temp> <006301c15f82$da0cbe60$1c01000a@jamessonyvaio> <001e01c15fae$010900c0$f006738c@ncu.edu.tw> <p05101003b801e8c9a90b@[165.227.249.20]> <001101c1604b$0a2b2d20$f006738c@ncu.edu.tw> <p0510100fb8034e089e46@[165.227.249.18]> <000d01c160ee$a8936740$cd462b18@mtag1.on.home.com> <4494016.1004425315@[0.0.0.0]> <013601c16121$9b4bb690$4607e29f@xiaodonglee> <p05101004b8047fd96a26@[165.227.249.20]> <009f01c161a9$aadcd110$dd00a8c0@jamessonyvaio>
Subject: Note: WG Process - Was Re: [idn] Traditional-simplified, yet again
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 09:51:43 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700
Sender: owner-idn@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I like to remind everyone that if a draft is not published AND have not
been accepted into this working group, the draft is as good as not exist
in the view of the working group. We will not and cannot wait
indefinately. Neither should we stall the process on a REAL-SOON-NOW
draft.

The working group should, must and will proceed with the drafts
currently in its pool, currently:

Internationalizing Host Names In Applications
(IDNA)(draft-ietf-idn-idna)
Preparation of Internationalized Host Names (draft-ietf-idn-nameprep)
Proposal for a determining process of ACE identifier
(draft-ietf-idn-aceid)
Japanese characters in multilingual domain name label
(draft-ietf-idn-jpchar)
Traditional and Simplified Chinese Conversion (draft-ietf-idn-tsconv)
Hangeul NAMEPREP recommendation version 1.0(draft-ietf-idn-hangeulchar)
Improving ACE using code point reordering v1.0(draft-ietf-idn-lsb-ace)
AMC-ACE-Z (draft-ietf-idn-amc-ace-z)

-James Seng

----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Hoffman / IMC" <phoffman@imc.org>
To: "Xiaodong LEE" <lee@cnnic.net.cn>
Cc: <idn@ops.ietf.org>; <jet-member@nic.ad.jp>
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:08 AM
Subject: [JET-member 491] Re: [idn] Traditional-simplified, yet again


> Thank you for this message, particularly the tone of it. You talk
> about a draft and ask us to read it carefully. I would very much like
> to do that (and would certainly like to read it more than the recent
> messages!), but I don't know which draft you are speaking about. Was
> it announced and I missed it? Or will it be ready soon?
>
> --Paul Hoffman, Director
> --Internet Mail Consortium

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email