Re: [idn] meeting in Yokohama
"xiaodong lee" <lee@cnnic.net.cn> Fri, 17 May 2002 01:52 UTC
Received: from psg.com (exim@psg.com [147.28.0.62]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA17804 for <idn-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2002 21:52:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lserv by psg.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1) id 178WgO-000Fcr-00 for idn-data@psg.com; Thu, 16 May 2002 18:37:24 -0700
Received: from [159.226.6.187] (helo=whale.cnnic.net.cn) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 178WgN-000Fck-00 for idn@ops.ietf.org; Thu, 16 May 2002 18:37:23 -0700
Received: from xiaodonglee ([159.226.7.70]) by whale.cnnic.net.cn (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id GW8F7N00.VJN; Fri, 17 May 2002 09:38:11 +0800
Message-ID: <00cc01c1fd43$3f5fbe80$4607e29f@xiaodonglee>
Reply-To: Xiaodong LEE <lee@cnnic.net.cn>
From: xiaodong lee <lee@cnnic.net.cn>
To: John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com>, James Seng <jseng@pobox.org.sg>, IETF/IDN WG <idn@ops.ietf.org>
References: <001501c1fd3c$73e2e800$4607e29f@xiaodonglee> <95659266.1021584525@localhost>
Subject: Re: [idn] meeting in Yokohama
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 09:36:20 +0800
Organization: CAS&CNIC&CNNIC
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Sender: owner-idn@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by ietf.org id VAA17804
Dear John, Thank you for the suggestion, I see. I think there are one point to be make clear. Just shut it down? how about the four drafts? xiaodong ________________________________________ ----- 原始邮件 ----- 发件人: "John C Klensin" <klensin@jck.com> 收件人: "Xiaodong LEE" <lee@cnnic.net.cn>; "James Seng" <jseng@pobox.org.sg>; "IETF/IDN WG" <idn@ops.ietf.org> 发送时间: 2002年5月17日 上午 09:28 主题: Re: [idn] meeting in Yokohama | | | --On Friday, 17 May, 2002 08:47 +0800 xiaodong lee | <lee@cnnic.net.cn> wrote: | | > I think it is necessary to meet each other, coz there maybe | > some other things to be decided in face to face meeting for so | > many active persons in IDN WG, e.g. next step for IDN. | > And with that, we should absorb more people to complete the | > idn-admin which is the great job. | | For whatever it is worth, and with the understanding that I'm | speaking only for myself, I'd suggest a different model. We | should finish the small amount of work that is clearly on IDN's | agenda and shut it down. The WG has just dragged on too long | and accumulated too much baggage and debris. Then, if you (or | others) have other agenda items (I know I do), it would be good | write the ideas down in the form of a proposal for a BOF or a | draft charter for another WG. In other words, shutting IDN down | doesn't terminate all of the work that will now have to be done | with these names, including examining how they fit into | applications and how selected applications protocols should be | extended or modified. That work is important and should be done | somewhere. But there are few, if any, advantages of trying to | fit it into the IDN WG and we have all observed the | disadvantages of trying to do so. | | regards, | john | |
- Re: [idn] meeting in Yokohama xiaodong lee
- Re: [idn] meeting in Yokohama xiaodong lee
- Re: [idn] meeting in Yokohama liana Ye
- Re: [idn] meeting in Yokohama Rick Wesson
- Re: [idn] meeting in Yokohama Dave Crocker
- Re: [idn] meeting in Yokohama John C Klensin
- Re: [idn] meeting in Yokohama Rick Wesson
- Re: [idn] meeting in Yokohama John C Klensin
- Re: [idn] meeting in Yokohama Erik Nordmark
- Re: [idn] meeting in Yokohama Soobok Lee
- Re: [idn] meeting in Yokohama Soobok Lee
- [idn] meeting in Yokohama James Seng
- Re: [idn] meeting in Yokohama John C Klensin
- Re: [idn] meeting in Yokohama Ketu Patel
- Re: [idn] meeting in Yokohama John C Klensin
- Re: [idn] meeting in Yokohama xiaodong lee
- Re: [idn] meeting in Yokohama Jaap Akkerhuis
- Re: [idn] meeting in Yokohama liana Ye