[Idna-update] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5890 (7291)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 03 January 2023 23:05 UTC

Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=50.223.129.200; helo=rfcpa.amsl.com; envelope-from=wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com; receiver=<UNKNOWN>
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: poccil14@gmail.com, john+ietf@jck.com, idna-update@alvestrand.no
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20230103230547.1712D61C5AF@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2023 15:05:47 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idna-update/NA_bmmJrIIOYgXl15ar9GA3JSFQ>
Subject: [Idna-update] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5890 (7291)
Precedence: list

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5890,
"Internationalized Domain Names for Applications (IDNA): Definitions and Document Framework".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7291

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Peter Occil <poccil14@gmail.com>

Section: 2.3.2.1

Original Text
-------------
   For IDNA-aware applications, the three types of valid labels are
   "A-labels", "U-labels", and "NR-LDH labels", each of which is defined
   below.


Corrected Text
--------------
   For IDNA-aware applications, the three types of valid labels are
   "A-labels", "U-labels", and "NR-LDH labels", each of which is defined
   below and in section 2.3.1.

Notes
-----
The term NR-LDH label is actually defined in section 2.3.1, not later in this section.

AD note: In reality, at least from the author's perspective, "NR-LDH
label" is defined in the section of that name, i.e., 2.3.2.2,
which is "below" 2.3.2.1.  Whether 2.3.1 also "defines" it or
supplements that definition (or if 2.3.2.1 supplements what
2.3.1 has to say) is a matter for debate, but it is clear that
the text cited would benefit from a reference to 2.3.1.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC5890 (draft-ietf-idnabis-defs-13)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Internationalized Domain Names for Applications (IDNA): Definitions and Document Framework
Publication Date    : August 2010
Author(s)           : J. Klensin
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (Revised)
Area                : Applications
Stream              : IETF

[Idna-update] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5890… RFC Errata System