IDN example TLDs (2606bis)

"Frank Ellermann" <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com> Fri, 11 July 2008 22:13 UTC

Return-Path: <ggii-idna-update@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To: idna-update@alvestrand.no
Delivered-To: idna-update@alvestrand.no
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEE6239E713 for <idna-update@alvestrand.no>; Sat, 12 Jul 2008 00:13:12 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eikenes.alvestrand.no
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id II4E9smAAvpS for <idna-update@alvestrand.no>; Sat, 12 Jul 2008 00:13:12 +0200 (CEST)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.6.8
Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C10E39E70D for <idna-update@alvestrand.no>; Sat, 12 Jul 2008 00:13:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KHQrb-0001Ub-O1 for idna-update@alvestrand.no; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 22:13:15 +0000
Received: from rain.gmane.org ([80.91.229.7]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <idna-update@alvestrand.no>; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 22:13:15 +0000
Received: from hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz by rain.gmane.org with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <idna-update@alvestrand.no>; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 22:13:15 +0000
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: idna-update@alvestrand.no
From: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
Subject: IDN example TLDs (2606bis)
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 00:13:39 +0200
Organization: <URL:http://purl.net/xyzzy>
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <g58lth$4lj$1@ger.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: rain.gmane.org
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1914
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1914
Sender: news <news@ger.gmane.org>
X-BeenThere: idna-update@alvestrand.no
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IDNA update work <idna-update.alvestrand.no>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update>, <mailto:idna-update-request@alvestrand.no?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update>
List-Post: <mailto:idna-update@alvestrand.no>
List-Help: <mailto:idna-update-request@alvestrand.no?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update>, <mailto:idna-update-request@alvestrand.no?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 22:13:12 -0000

Hi, an update wrt IDN test + example TLDs in version 09
of the draft:  

- No problems with the 11 IDN test TLDs were reported.
  That's apparently good enough, IFF you are sure that
  IDNAbis sticks to some A-label + U-label terminology. 

- Almost no support to reserve IDN example TLDs so far,
  unfortunately.  If you want to change this please get
  a WG consensus on public record.  The 11 IDN example
  SLDs are low hanging fruits, but not low enough for a
  "domain grabbing" stunt without strong IETF backup.

- This WG isn't interested to adopt the "reserved TLDs"
  draft as work item, or is it ?  [I've no difficulties
  to read the WG Charter, but maybe I need the question
  on public record.]

I'd like to get those 4+11+1 "reserved TLDs" out of the
way, before any attempts to fix the RFC 1123 <toplabel>.

 Frank
-- 
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ellermann-idnabis-test-tlds