Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt
"Chengli (Cheng Li)" <c.l@huawei.com> Tue, 11 August 2020 07:27 UTC
Return-Path: <c.l@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E8B33A0DA8; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 00:27:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t6WF1QNTWvqe; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 00:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91EFD3A0DA3; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 00:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml722-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 41F2655F25AA9577399C; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 08:27:51 +0100 (IST)
Received: from lhreml722-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.73) by lhreml722-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 08:27:51 +0100
Received: from DGGEML421-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.38) by lhreml722-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1913.5 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 08:27:50 +0100
Received: from DGGEML509-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.78]) by dggeml421-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.1.199.38]) with mapi id 14.03.0487.000; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 15:27:46 +0800
From: "Chengli (Cheng Li)" <c.l@huawei.com>
To: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>, "i-d-announce@ietf.org" <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt
Thread-Index: AQHWb6/gAelObQHj8U6L3kV0Gbps+KkygR0Q
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 07:27:46 +0000
Message-ID: <C7C2E1C43D652C4E9E49FE7517C236CB02B63222@dggeml509-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <159713038956.17988.14680339555451108880@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <159713038956.17988.14680339555451108880@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.108.243.130]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/0nfctYprx-mHljUOh4HfVk6CimU>
Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 07:27:54 -0000
Hi IDRers, We just updated the draft to address the comments we received. The comments have been listed in https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/udC8cV5mn7M7othzgM26kcK_Kps/, and we have addressed the comments. Welcome to review the document and please feel free to let me know if you have any comments! Many thanks and stay safe! Cheng -----Original Message----- From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2020 3:20 PM To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Cc: idr@ietf.org Subject: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Inter-Domain Routing WG of the IETF. Title : SR Policy Extensions for Path Segment and Bidirectional Path Authors : Cheng Li Zhenbin Li Huanan Chen Weiqiang Cheng Ketan Talaulikar Filename : draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt Pages : 12 Date : 2020-08-11 Abstract: A Segment Routing (SR) policy is a set of candidate SR paths consisting of one or more segment lists with necessary path attributes. For each SR path, it may also have its own path attributes, and Path Segment is one of them. A Path Segment is defined to identify an SR path, which can be used for performance measurement, path correlation, and end-2-end path protection. Path Segment can be also used to correlate two unidirectional SR paths into a bidirectional SR path which is required in some scenarios, for example, mobile backhaul transport network. This document defines extensions to BGP to distribute SR policies carrying Path Segment and bidirectional path information. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-path-segment/ There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-path-segment-01 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-path-segment-01 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-path-segment-01 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ Idr mailing list Idr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
- [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-path-s… internet-drafts
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-pa… Chengli (Cheng Li)