IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-17.txt-advertise inactive

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@nexthop.com> Thu, 19 September 2002 15:23 UTC

Received: from trapdoor.merit.edu (postfix@trapdoor.merit.edu [198.108.1.26]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA09633 for <idr-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 11:23:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) id 74A209120F; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 11:25:20 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: idr-outgoing@trapdoor.merit.edu
Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix, from userid 56) id 32412912A8; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 11:25:20 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: idr@trapdoor.merit.edu
Received: from segue.merit.edu (segue.merit.edu [198.108.1.41]) by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23FE29120F for <idr@trapdoor.merit.edu>; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 11:25:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) id 0A7A25E155; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 11:25:19 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: idr@merit.edu
Received: from presque.djinesys.com (dns.nexthop.com [64.211.218.216]) by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34B915E150 for <idr@merit.edu>; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 11:25:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from root@localhost) by presque.djinesys.com (8.11.3/8.11.1) id g8JFPG370507; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 11:25:16 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhaas@jhaas.nexthop.com)
Received: from jhaas.nexthop.com (jhaas.nexthop.com [64.211.218.31]) by presque.djinesys.com (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g8JFPDG70500; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 11:25:13 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhaas@jhaas.nexthop.com)
Received: (from jhaas@localhost) by jhaas.nexthop.com (8.11.3nb1/8.11.3) id g8JFPDV15325; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 11:25:13 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 11:25:13 -0400
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@nexthop.com>
To: "Abarbanel, Benjamin" <Benjamin.Abarbanel@marconi.com>
Cc: idr@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-17.txt-advertise inactive
Message-ID: <20020919112513.E14795@nexthop.com>
References: <39469E08BD83D411A3D900204840EC55BC2E8E@vie-msgusr-01.dc.fore.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <39469E08BD83D411A3D900204840EC55BC2E8E@vie-msgusr-01.dc.fore.com>; from Benjamin.Abarbanel@Marconi.com on Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 04:56:01PM -0400
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11
Sender: owner-idr@merit.edu
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 04:56:01PM -0400, Abarbanel, Benjamin wrote:
> Then all other route types that win over the BGP routes in the Routing table
> should be automatically exported to BGP.

Probably the simplest way of dealing with this is dealing with
the case when a route in LocRib and the Routing table conflict
and the Routing Table has a non-BGP route installed in it is
to note that (in almost all cases if not always) the route actually
installed in the Routing Table is the one passed to Phase 3 of
the selection process.

-- 
Jeff Haas 
NextHop Technologies

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status