IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-bgp-attribute-announcement dead on arrival?

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Wed, 05 October 2016 15:54 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E88EB1297A5 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 08:54:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.945
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.945 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qOLkiOjrvIf8 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 08:54:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-97-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 980A11297A3 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 08:54:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=174.124.177.17;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: 'Jeffrey Haas' <jhaas@pfrc.org>, 'IETF IDR WG' <idr@ietf.org>
References: <0E9469C4-2B72-484A-9C93-BC13401F6889@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <0E9469C4-2B72-484A-9C93-BC13401F6889@pfrc.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 11:53:15 -0400
Message-ID: <003901d21f20$95ece2f0$c1c6a8d0$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQJqd/5OiARNgmjBwcNLKllywB1Xrp9pT8iw
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/3f7rGjuzFhsxfWZB3MXKcu4IpLo>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-bgp-attribute-announcement dead on arrival?
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 15:54:49 -0000

Jeff:
<individual contributor hat on> 

My reading of the list that:  
a) Large communities meets an "urgent/crisis level need"
b) Wide communities and bgp-attribute-announcement - meet a longer term
need. 

Did I miss understand the list's comments? 

Sue 
-----Original Message-----
From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Haas
Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 11:49 AM
To: IETF IDR WG
Subject: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-bgp-attribute-announcement dead on arrival?

In theory, by adoping draft-ietf-idr-bgp-attribute-announcement, IDR agreed
that attribute scoping was an important issue.

As proven by the working group discussion on BGP large communities, the WG
seems unwilling to consider anything that adds any level of complexity onto
certain proposals.

Should we simply consider this draft dead?

-- Jeff

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status