[Idr] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-17

Vincent Roca via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 23 October 2020 13:42 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietf.org
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EFC93A0DE1; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 06:42:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Vincent Roca via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: <secdir@ietf.org>
Cc: idr@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6.all@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.20.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <160346052821.25772.11548718218613853456@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Vincent Roca <vincent.roca@inria.fr>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 06:42:08 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/3gFNEKLP7h1JTnmjQPf6hMaz_Q0>
Subject: [Idr] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-17
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 13:42:08 -0000

Reviewer: Vincent Roca
Review result: Ready


I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate’s ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area
directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

Summary: Ready

The security considerations section is kept minimum since it only adds IPv6
format support to the "Dissemination of Flow Specification Rules"
(draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-26) document where the full Security Consideration
discussion takes place. I also believe there is no added security issue.

- Introduction: typo, add a final "s" to propose in: "and propose a subset..."

Cheers,    Vincent