[Idr] Status of post-WG drafts

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Sun, 24 April 2022 07:39 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 294433A1720; Sun, 24 Apr 2022 00:39:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.904
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.904 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAY_BE_FORGED=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dzrnew7l4e1r; Sun, 24 Apr 2022 00:39:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta8.iomartmail.com (mta8.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 058293A1967; Sun, 24 Apr 2022 00:39:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (vs2.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.123]) by mta8.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 23O7d28S009833; Sun, 24 Apr 2022 08:39:02 +0100
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9BD94604C; Sun, 24 Apr 2022 08:38:59 +0100 (BST)
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD3B446048; Sun, 24 Apr 2022 08:38:59 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.248]) by vs2.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Sun, 24 Apr 2022 08:38:59 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V (205.197.bbplus.pte-ag1.dyn.plus.net [81.174.197.205] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 23O7cxJ9017806 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 24 Apr 2022 08:38:59 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: idr-chairs@ietf.org
Cc: idr@ietf.org
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2022 08:38:58 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <01b101d857ae$5c6d42a0$1547c7e0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AdhXrQF62Y9i3XYYSMqaEi1q8BMSsw==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 81.174.197.205
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1000-26852.006
X-TM-AS-Result: No--4.313-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--4.313-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1000-26852.006
X-TMASE-Result: 10--4.312500-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: AR6nduzOSGmwHZ1ma7tfpo61Z+HJnvsO9pLnYtQ99xLqq06ntg4wyWmS 1/aq2TyiVHll461yvk68/lUDKkI1vdZx0BKWTuVW0e7jfBjhB8elY4F8r0vXP77LhjjzshwBcLe dUKcF/pwtwbhryrzz3jRtVh8pBg1Bl1bc/4UP/k7fqVBdB7I8UcXXUa56bTnnmyiLZetSf8nJ4y 0wP1A6ADMMszeAZpzJDV8DVAd6AO/dB/CxWTRRu/558CedkGIvqcoAhihTwvh9aCDfozCbh4N5/ W62L0B6a8gVmnwTcWDLZnPgcoYSd2hiPk9AJv0L
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/5jdA9tQg80_jz1Sd3lfidDYk0Is>
Subject: [Idr] Status of post-WG drafts
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2022 07:39:31 -0000

Hi chairs,

Thanks so much for maintaining
https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/idr-draft-status. It's a really useful
reference to understand the status of the working group's output.

Although the Datatracker no longer reports the time that a draft has
languished in any particular state, it is sort of possible to work it out
from the History tab for each draft. However, your wiki is a much clear
indication of where the action lies.

What I see is six IDR drafts with the AD for their review or processing.
Although some of these are now moving (IETF last calls, etc.) the backlog
appears to be pretty stale.

Funnily, I went to the wiki to look up the status of draft-ietf-idr-rpd. I
find that that is the most junior of the drafts in the AD's queue. Turns
out, that has only been in the queue for two and a half months.

Do you think we need to do any light stimulation of the AD?

Cheers,
Adrian