IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Idr] Status of BGP OPERATIONAL Message

marco@lamehost.it Tue, 05 April 2016 11:58 UTC

Return-Path: <marco@lamehost.it>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB0B912D50D for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 04:58:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rGn32y2iBTiY for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 04:58:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from seele.lamehost.it (seele.lamehost.it [80.76.80.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58CF212D1E4 for <Idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 04:58:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by seele.lamehost.it (Postfix, from userid 33) id 0CA30743EF; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 13:58:39 +0200 (CEST)
To: Idr@ietf.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 0:rcube.php
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 13:58:38 +0200
From: marco@lamehost.it
Message-ID: <e7a1a8706c1582791b626344887198d6@lamehost.it>
X-Sender: marco@lamehost.it
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1.4
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/7yXRCUXCdmVXO8ZwX0wwkCXAAzc>
Subject: [Idr] Status of BGP OPERATIONAL Message
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 11:58:46 -0000

Hello All,

I have read the threads regarding draft-frs-bgp-operational-message and 
i wonder if there are actual plans for deploying the it or not.

The reason I am asking is that I see value in a mechanism that 
advertises the value of MAXPREFIX to the BGP peer which the above can 
handle with the ADVISE TLVs.

My feeling is that BGP OPERATIONAL Message goes behind the scope and 
transforms BGP in a general-purpose network messaging queue, but if 
there are plans to implement that I would prefer to wait than to suggest 
to re-invent the wheel.

Thank you

Regards

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email