IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-15: (with COMMENT)

"Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <ketant@cisco.com> Thu, 27 June 2019 17:38 UTC

Return-Path: <ketant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B668B120337; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 10:38:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=NNK85G1K; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=S2nwhTAy
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TRygUAydtc78; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 10:38:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A8F7120168; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 10:38:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2608; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1561657101; x=1562866701; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=ZRxYxjPqfhKtY9b21Z4J8Y6vfMIRgUAXDsJTCH3JUr0=; b=NNK85G1KtHM4Xyp0Nvmq2oxy7hw3pHN3JEgo71PH7UK2kb2q64PFr2i1 0mumY8YQtz5KHc7EiKXqZs+1am0KxqRWc/sjXTLe91cWGTHucKfXyIRFW vDS3bLGYphJkGvxqZwYxPJ2FRmDQg09V8qJAsiRd954GJT0Low39pqREW Y=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:cADavhC8mw9GykpSL0F1UyQJPHJ1sqjoPgMT9pssgq5PdaLm5Zn5IUjD/qg83kTRU9Dd7PRJw6rNvqbsVHZIwK7JsWtKMfkuHwQAld1QmgUhBMCfDkiuL/P2ZiomNM9DT1RiuXq8NBsdFQ==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AIAAD0/RRd/5tdJa1lGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEHAgEBAQGBUwUBAQEBCwGBQ1ADalUgBAsohBmDRwOEUooIglt+iE2NdIEuFIEQA1QJAQEBDAEBJQgCAQGEQAIXgmkjNAkOAQMBAQQBAQIBBW2KNwyFSgEBAQMBEhERDAEBNwEEBwQCAQgRBAEBAwImAgICHxEVCAgCBAENBQgagwGBagMODwEOmysCgTiIYHGBMoJ5AQEFgTYCDkGDAQ0LghEDBoEMKAGLXheBQD+BEUaCFzU+ghpHAQEBAgGBKgESASGDCDKCJowPgiAvmmcmPwkCgheGUokyBIQIgiuHF44cjSmHOIFwjXYCBAIEBQIOAQEFgVA4Z1gRCHAVgyeCQQwXFIM6hRSFP3IBgSiLNYJDAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.63,424,1557187200"; d="scan'208";a="363734663"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 27 Jun 2019 17:38:20 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-007.cisco.com (xch-aln-007.cisco.com [173.36.7.17]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x5RHcJ5v009581 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 17:38:20 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) by XCH-ALN-007.cisco.com (173.36.7.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 12:38:19 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 12:38:18 -0500
Received: from NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 12:38:18 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=ZRxYxjPqfhKtY9b21Z4J8Y6vfMIRgUAXDsJTCH3JUr0=; b=S2nwhTAyVI3IPIvoBjxoq+y/7GpY0NDHs/UmztCXzZNh4pDGzq+9LaSeJqLYEEEOG9meaL519un6uOpois3YHY8MyyuQI5xx3nbwCal44StUOiuN0fPegN8iiB08IoWWX8BZ4ceBxNWg2QPxwkEmRFjmuLbn588NVdRIhUZ2eqc=
Received: from DM5PR11MB2027.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.168.103.22) by DM5PR11MB1466.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.172.36.137) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2008.16; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 17:38:17 +0000
Received: from DM5PR11MB2027.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::a17c:926e:d76e:b6e5]) by DM5PR11MB2027.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::a17c:926e:d76e:b6e5%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2008.018; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 17:38:17 +0000
From: "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <ketant@cisco.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext@ietf.org>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "aretana.ietf@gmail.com" <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, "idr-chairs@ietf.org" <idr-chairs@ietf.org>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-15: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHVIaFYgT2k22cjOEWEKUvQSdc7t6avoSsQ
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 17:38:17 +0000
Message-ID: <DM5PR11MB2027D7B0B41FE32C41577B9FC1FD0@DM5PR11MB2027.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <156040048349.27110.1051819060842698176.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <156040048349.27110.1051819060842698176.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=ketant@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0e0:1007::310]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: b538cf21-cde4-414b-e0af-08d6fb263d32
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:DM5PR11MB1466;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM5PR11MB1466:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 3
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM5PR11MB14665BA811B1E6656074F468C1FD0@DM5PR11MB1466.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 008184426E
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(39860400002)(346002)(376002)(366004)(136003)(396003)(199004)(13464003)(51914003)(189003)(316002)(71200400001)(25786009)(99286004)(71190400001)(476003)(81156014)(55016002)(81166006)(4326008)(256004)(7736002)(305945005)(8676002)(54906003)(6306002)(9686003)(110136005)(6436002)(446003)(11346002)(46003)(186003)(229853002)(486006)(64756008)(102836004)(33656002)(6506007)(53546011)(73956011)(66446008)(66556008)(66476007)(66946007)(53936002)(76116006)(74316002)(52536014)(7696005)(5660300002)(76176011)(6246003)(2906002)(14454004)(68736007)(478600001)(86362001)(6116002)(966005)(8936002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DM5PR11MB1466; H:DM5PR11MB2027.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: Zh6KRERLqvzc2HhyQSCUf9XtQ6RisqyxpJBgwUgiJwBTD77XLMKrpG11pBh95G4cJj9exWdeFqJEc2c+Y8AdgxVXt97tSPWjKVDmPcsEwI7TmHr5O2sixtURSbnhICKgpbI6cZzNBcYXlUgmovh227cxUqyddDrGSXtMw6/Z9ocThY9JFZQIlNZfEDFca3cc1wqZcm3zYzP/ShiAOkWg0u/upyDXyUa1P6hJsyIoPJIdHlFIahC8Mn2bdlanVfH83jWgMkx1UdUp6PV57Z+qkcWTR1/p/z2CtOyLDkXe1p5au9xw82TVpjz+1icsX4fDEArXkHxDVw/nuvzhU+9xxgZrdyVIMggObtq+c1r4robbYdlIdc/1Me5ibrVeDHDirIzENMvz8f+TyiLDjXuvHwlzth60MBxGgMyHJnkGb8c=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: b538cf21-cde4-414b-e0af-08d6fb263d32
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 27 Jun 2019 17:38:17.2466 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: ketant@cisco.com
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR11MB1466
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.17, xch-aln-007.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-4.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/88nZ3NBeJtEzxl_zuYXqd71v6lU>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-15: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 17:38:30 -0000

Hi Adam,

Thanks for your review. I've made the changes suggested for the reserved fields to address your and Benjamin's comments.

The version 16 has been posted with these changes:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-16 

Thanks,
Ketan

-----Original Message-----
From: Adam Roach via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> 
Sent: 13 June 2019 10:05
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext@ietf.org; Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>; aretana.ietf@gmail.com; idr-chairs@ietf.org; shares@ndzh.com; idr@ietf.org
Subject: Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-15: (with COMMENT)

Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-15: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for the work that everyone did on this document. I have only one very minor comment.

§2.1.2:

>     Reserved: 1 octet that SHOULD be set to 0 and MUST be ignored on
>     receipt.

Making this a "SHOULD" rather than a "MUST" seems like it might interfere with any future attempts to use this field, since compliant implementations might have set the byte to arbitrary values.

This comment applies to other "reserved" fields in this document.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email