IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Implementation call for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages (1/24/2017 to 1/31/2017)

Robert Varga <nite@hq.sk> Fri, 27 January 2017 09:38 UTC

Return-Path: <nite@hq.sk>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97BD612948F for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 01:38:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hq.sk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id grf1rJ1rM4cb for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 01:38:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.hq.sk (hq.sk [81.89.59.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA17D1293D9 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 01:38:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.137.2.13] (46.229.239.158.host.vnet.sk [46.229.239.158]) by mail.hq.sk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A128E2400E9; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 10:38:27 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=hq.sk; s=mail; t=1485509907; bh=TDls0XTXpSn0a3yZFQTkxZswPWoYZh/4mDyVQtKolmU=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=RgYRTSmhkYKmRg4VG29SBY0noQbon2mZGjnFKGpP2A7p2bHbjZVwBvdB5QD2jfzvC MOMgzCKk77kw8Jomu7baryXrfz7DxT9AAErV2Jjzmh5oIOou6cc/EQp8660Y9SLTAs rrSWkQDc4YVJV6CFUww4L0oFPWJhiLjor6BRpGFc=
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, idr@ietf.org
References: <01fa01d27677$3c54c560$b4fe5020$@ndzh.com>
From: Robert Varga <nite@hq.sk>
Message-ID: <e35a64ca-60f3-b7b8-9ce2-5dfff2a0fb27@hq.sk>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 10:38:15 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <01fa01d27677$3c54c560$b4fe5020$@ndzh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NuNFTC7MEktHqsMJQQ6I93SA2i6Pm8kO2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/9P-RqLzBTTomh4DPZyxX2rseI10>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Implementation call for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages (1/24/2017 to 1/31/2017)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 09:38:33 -0000

On 01/24/2017 08:22 PM, Susan Hares wrote:
> The document draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages has past WG LC, but it
> is awaiting implementations.  Do you know of any implementations –
> partial or full?  If so, please respond with an note to this email or
> send the chairs a note privately.

Hello,

OpenDaylight implements this draft since its Boron release.

Regards,
Robert

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email