[Idr] Re: [bess] Re: Re: Re: Re: draft-ietf-idr-vpn-prefix-orf-25 - 1 Week WGLC onchanges (1/29/2026 to 1/5/2026)

[Jeffrey Haas <[e-mail]>]

Aijun, 

Please see my question regarding the overload bit in section 5.2. What distinguishes each case?

Jeff

> On Feb 25, 2026, at 20:03, Aijun Wang <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Hi, Jeff and Robert:
> 
> Regarding to the name of "Sequence" field, I think we can modify it later to "EntryID", which may be more accurate.
> And, to Jeff's questions, what's the "two modes" refer to in your question?
> 
> Aijun
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Haas
> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2026 6:11 AM
> To: Wei Wang <[e-mail]>
> Cc: idr <[e-mail]>; Robert Raszuk <[e-mail]>; BESS <[e-mail]>; Sue Hares <[e-mail]>; Keyur Patel <[e-mail]>
> Subject: [Idr] Re: [bess] Re: Re: Re: Re: draft-ietf-idr-vpn-prefix-orf-25 - 1 Week WGLC onchanges (1/29/2026 to 1/5/2026)
> 
> Wei,
> 
> 
>> On Feb 25, 2026, at 04:19, Wei Wang <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> I think we can add the following sentence in Section 5.2 to clarify that if there no VPN Prefix ORF entry on the device, all VPN routes are permit to be sent:
>> “The default entry for the VPN Prefix ORF type is "Permit All", which means that all routes that do not match the existing entries in the VPN Prefix ORF table shall be advertised.”
>> 
>> We will update the description of receiver and RR/ASBR according to Jeffrey's comment.
>> 
>> Furthermore, I suggest keeping 'Sequence' as it can serve as an identifier for operations such as deletion and update of VPN Prefix ORF entries.
> 
> 
> I'd suggest waiting on changes until the question I asked is answered.  It impacts the suggestions for the updated text.
> 
> What's the difference between the two modes?
> 
> -- Jeff
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]