[Idr] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages-35: (with COMMENT)

Alissa Cooper via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 06 August 2019 17:12 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietf.org
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3701120144; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 10:12:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alissa Cooper via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages@ietf.org, jgs@juniper.net, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, jie.dong@huawei.com, idr-chairs@ietf.org, idr@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.100.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Message-ID: <156511156598.18231.12072435808142560538.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2019 10:12:45 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/BABby_8Tc2QXhseu7NDmMiaFN-0>
Subject: [Idr] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages-35: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2019 17:12:46 -0000

Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages-35: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


'When propagating that UPDATE onward to a neighbor which has not
   advertised the BGP Extended Message capability, the speaker SHOULD
   try to reduce the outgoing message size by removing attributes
   eligible under the "attribute discard" approach of [RFC7606].'

This might be a bit clearer if it were to explain that "eligibility" is not
limited to malformed attributes (since RFC 7606 could be read as having that