Re: [Idr] Few questions about Segment Routing extensions for BGP LS (draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext)
Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Wed, 21 July 2021 13:04 UTC
Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D05083A15A3 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 06:04:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0zXxHeAEIx6x for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 06:04:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x230.google.com (mail-lj1-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F83B3A15A5 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 06:04:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x230.google.com with SMTP id t20so2953900ljd.2 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 06:04:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2sqA5qaTf4qDFmMlywxjZwWeUk74tEQ1WZgSsgodjS4=; b=I8fnHPmAQm6CgCpuaWvMkDObC3AlNzxs+eI9k6RUYJs6VZnrQtZDrQXRLsMRZXP29A AA1BbYhyeI5nQE8Bz0Yl8bNoy3HbywiYe8gohFbfKH2emZAkEZwO2fVyUN2HVMPl4iXK 2S1X8n5bK2yPzYH39xg8FLzjsLzanMUvkpaigxDuuYORpNmQ7KUbT4yryWFoql1hT009 Nm7rduIXDTa9tCT1NnjnErm5azPJV5fwmhvpmBm3bkk0zh6xdxqOxo6VZVAjVvzwcV7c n0f1ZcifYvinOwUqyhpYzfNQjOeuUidqOFRpG+0J0jEKhXFZH8zSmn3i6+hDPwA1a4rF /mjQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2sqA5qaTf4qDFmMlywxjZwWeUk74tEQ1WZgSsgodjS4=; b=MhlVuO9LjnQX8WlmxryMdcliS1dn4B9HYDW1dhISJk7vg1PkpvkpLfFr8A/qCQ37CS L20SRwTGOJknbDGlG5Gj9yLj0pQ76zwi1+gGSWA0FEIUuNH1m5YFnD5wwFw/+8Ytem/4 oUXU3ERap/umLLrM0cVBVrCYB4QGcHerUiZ1aaQKPfYyz9y3YsIXP1i3USlmcZ53SLqj HM6WWdZbBacZaLjaSZ/33tmMhakYOaI+IACE+0iIMRIx4tB1fQ1zDf3XsBy1AflmjYQ1 WTngnAMpZ7a2SV0KOkNYa2yPZfyN91b+szQ8ijZSn1MGV48ogLVpTGU95HcDk+mOMe4C ejcQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530qOtdy2y+82HAfnqC34mhZ93E9Zz5OBki5wpaKyuZdWT1hyDDV cIV9El6Cb/QpZFwCG6eBkOlXyGN7FdcC1So8zOiWsA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwAL2kNUGwyKA6zW+gyjrvIMKm/nFRyPq3WlVBjEOBE6YGqoLuttGT/1lPh6GpXvRM/g5IJ6EkGRz/mRvEQlu4=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:3310:: with SMTP id d16mr31776652ljc.199.1626872673690; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 06:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1162423632.764584.1626861282633.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1162423632.764584.1626861282633@mail.yahoo.com> <CAOj+MMGwgE7NDijTiuFRKCi2ifw-8j9BBjkTELYJUCReADF0Zw@mail.gmail.com> <1543602023.781408.1626870166775@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <1543602023.781408.1626870166775@mail.yahoo.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 15:04:22 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOj+MME6tryihOe3h2wOt_EhA8+5nmXckH7xDJU2GzGDiaCX_g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Boris Hassanov <bhassanov@yahoo.com>
Cc: IDR List <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cf735c05c7a1cfe3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/BkM3Pnlqodnh140LGT6ntxMPSqU>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Few questions about Segment Routing extensions for BGP LS (draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 13:04:46 -0000
> > Regarding 2nd question, I checked 4 major vendors BGP-LS implementations > in our lab with SR-MPLS and all of them do use only Prefix SID TLV for > sending their Node SIDs. That was a reason for my confusion about > SID/Label TLV usage > The easiest way to see this encoding in use would be to configure binding SIDs. Thx, R.
- [Idr] Few questions about Segment Routing extensi… Boris Hassanov
- Re: [Idr] Few questions about Segment Routing ext… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] Few questions about Segment Routing ext… Boris Hassanov
- Re: [Idr] Few questions about Segment Routing ext… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] Few questions about Segment Routing ext… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Idr] Few questions about Segment Routing ext… Wanghaibo (Rainsword)
- Re: [Idr] Few questions about Segment Routing ext… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: [Idr] Few questions about Segment Routing ext… Boris Hassanov
- Re: [Idr] Few questions about Segment Routing ext… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)