IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5065 (3791)

"John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net> Fri, 08 November 2013 16:10 UTC

Return-Path: <jgs@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0A4011E8189 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 08:10:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.379
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.379 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.913, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, UNRESOLVED_TEMPLATE=3.132]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4O4JCqNKwge4 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 08:10:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (ch1ehsobe006.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.181.186]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D01511E8184 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 08:10:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail109-ch1-R.bigfish.com (10.43.68.248) by CH1EHSOBE017.bigfish.com (10.43.70.67) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.22; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 16:10:36 +0000
Received: from mail109-ch1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail109-ch1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1354380233; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 16:10:36 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.240.101; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:BL2PRD0510HT004.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: 0
X-BigFish: VPS0(zz98dI9371Ic85fh1432Izz1f42h208ch1ee6h1de0h1fdah2073h2146h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1fc6h1082kzz1de098h17326ah172cdfh8275bh8275dh19a27bh1de097h186068hz2fh2a8h839hd25he5bhf0ah1288h12a5h12bdh137ah139eh1441h1504h1537h162dh1631h1662h1758h1898h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah1b2bh1bceh224fh1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1dfeh1dffh1e1dh1e23h1fe8h1ff5h2052h20b3h20f0h2218h2216h1155h)
Received-SPF: pass (mail109-ch1: domain of juniper.net designates 157.56.240.101 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.240.101; envelope-from=jgs@juniper.net; helo=BL2PRD0510HT004.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ;
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(51704005)(24454002)(377454003)(189002)(199002)(77982001)(74502001)(47446002)(80022001)(47976001)(50226001)(63696002)(49866001)(59766001)(4396001)(56776001)(50986001)(47736001)(74706001)(46102001)(81816001)(81686001)(79102001)(66066001)(82746002)(15975445006)(69226001)(51856001)(31966008)(74662001)(57306001)(80976001)(19580405001)(54316002)(19580395003)(65816001)(84326002)(85306002)(74876001)(53806001)(42186004)(69556001)(62966002)(76482001)(15188155005)(74366001)(512954002)(15202345003)(83072001)(83322001)(16799955002)(77096001)(56816003)(77156001)(76786001)(76796001)(87286001)(81542001)(83716003)(87266001)(81342001)(36756003)(33656001)(87976001)(71186001)(42262001); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:DM2PR05MB527; H:sa-nc-finance-136.static.jnpr.net; CLIP:66.129.224.36; FPR:; RD:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
Received: from mail109-ch1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail109-ch1 (MessageSwitch) id 1383927035476541_7337; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 16:10:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from CH1EHSMHS021.bigfish.com (snatpool2.int.messaging.microsoft.com [10.43.68.237]) by mail109-ch1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DEA630013B; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 16:10:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from BL2PRD0510HT004.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (157.56.240.101) by CH1EHSMHS021.bigfish.com (10.43.70.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.227.3; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 16:10:35 +0000
Received: from DM2PR05MB527.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.99.151) by BL2PRD0510HT004.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.255.100.39) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.371.2; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 16:10:35 +0000
Received: from sa-nc-finance-136.static.jnpr.net (66.129.224.36) by DM2PR05MB527.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.99.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.815.6; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 16:10:33 +0000
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_922A6961-D4B1-413D-9BA2-35BF4C904654"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1816\))
From: "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <20131108120945.39BEE726002@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 08:10:22 -0800
Message-ID: <6153EFC2-9366-4B2B-ADC7-37BED5B7B485@juniper.net>
References: <20131108120945.39BEE726002@rfc-editor.org>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1816)
X-Originating-IP: [66.129.224.36]
X-ClientProxiedBy: DM2PR03CA001.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.52.149) To DM2PR05MB527.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.99.151)
X-Forefront-PRVS: 00246AB517
X-FOPE-CRA-Verdict: 157.56.240.101$infosys.com%0%1%DuplicateDomain-c684c95e-93ad-459f-9d80-96fa46cd75af.juniper.net%False%False%0$
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn%
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%INFOSYS.COM$RO%1$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn%
Cc: "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>, bgp-confederations@st04.pst.org, danny@arbor.net, Hares Susan <shares@ndzh.com>
Subject: Re: [Idr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5065 (3791)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 16:10:45 -0000

I agree with the erratum.

--John

On Nov 8, 2013, at 4:09 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:

> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5065,
> "Autonomous System Confederations for BGP".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5065&eid=3791
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Ramakrishna DTV <ramakrishnadtv@infosys.com>
> 
> Section: 7
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>   Additionally, confederations (as well as route reflectors), by
>   excluding different reachability information from consideration at
>   different locations in a confederation, have been shown [RFC3345] to
>   cause permanent oscillation between candidate routes when using the
>   tie-breaking rules required by BGP [BGP-4].
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>   Additionally, confederations (as well as route reflectors), by
>   excluding different reachability information from consideration at
>   different locations in a confederation, have been shown [RFC3345] to
>   cause persistent oscillation between candidate routes when using the
>   tie-breaking rules required by BGP [BGP-4].
> 
> Notes
> -----
> s/permanent/persistent
> 
> RFC 3345 nowhere refers to this oscillation as "permanent". It consistently refers to it as "persistent" only.
> 
> "Permanent" is a much stronger word than "persistent", and I believe is not applicable here.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC5065 (draft-ietf-idr-rfc3065bis-06)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Autonomous System Confederations for BGP
> Publication Date    : August 2007
> Author(s)           : P. Traina, D. McPherson, J. Scudder
> Category            : DRAFT STANDARD
> Source              : Inter-Domain Routing
> Area                : Routing
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email