IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Idr] draft-jdurand-auto-bfd-00

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Mon, 29 June 2015 16:07 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9FC81ACE85 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 09:07:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -97.155
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-97.155 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9zHqRg1WqXZR for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 09:07:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (hhc-web3.hickoryhill-consulting.com [64.9.205.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12F211ACE87 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 09:07:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=174.124.185.134;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: 'idr wg' <idr@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 12:07:34 -0400
Message-ID: <00a901d0b285$b6637430$232a5c90$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00AA_01D0B264.2F566810"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdCyhNrQT6K0GX6ITHiyQ7RgDJ0QsQ==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/D8MJoQclsi3tLrXGeu9l4R01qUI>
Cc: jjerduran@cisco.com, 'David Freedman' <david.freedman@uk.clara.net>
Subject: [Idr] draft-jdurand-auto-bfd-00
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 16:07:47 -0000

David and Jerome: 

 

Acee and Jeff Haas find this to be a useful solution to consider for FRR and
BGP. 

 

At the interim, it was suggested it would be useful for you to discuss on
the mail list: 

.         The differences between (draft-ietf-idrrs-bfd/draft-ymk-idr-bfd)
with your draft on the mail list? 

.         Any conflict between protection a BGP session at an IXP and
protecting the connectivity of a prefix? 

.         Any way this proposed standard changes BFD.

 

I'm sure I missed a few other valuable questions, but there seems to be real
interest in you leading a discussion on this point.   You can lead this
discussion on this thread or on the WG Adoption thread. 

 

Sue

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email