[Idr] 4 Byte extended community RFC 5668
Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Tue, 07 February 2023 21:20 UTC
Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE099C14F747 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Feb 2023 13:20:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.084
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.084 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OxXlIBLngYE9 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Feb 2023 13:19:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82b.google.com (mail-qt1-x82b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3BF3C14E515 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Feb 2023 13:19:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82b.google.com with SMTP id g18so16100410qtb.6 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 07 Feb 2023 13:19:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=5qWlJG+sh5LzNMh5+PUdNKCQ8IwY1XBx6pwj4GB5Afk=; b=JoOmHsvMNeqZ00p/fiShpUSVSL8k+cxCsGD0M+UvCVK+1ib+f8hZdrvYRntAlpZZHB KfMpmlSuMNVkw6xQO3uuI6F1B3Tg275YbhJlwi2YAxykrU766bZmGKm6NmhMUCVVu2kX 49Oe3xcmPbNEKHHnKCpLHrI9s8zqUOq34OZK9tjyyVFivbgBnlK0AGfXRNDrg+xyqrsg V8dhqS1G3mX4lliGWt31zAJiBOaHSb+/ci86f57vCxxidCMHeNYtwmJGm1Sh5baksYSw Tvhhk36laZ9WCqFdet7H2+pRoJasISRokvj9SfcU9LEgVC4LT75Kttz3j6+0YJdoGC19 7nrQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=5qWlJG+sh5LzNMh5+PUdNKCQ8IwY1XBx6pwj4GB5Afk=; b=E7dE6zbaHHybtiVR1DrLwj4qWWQ1H6jdki+Iqqh1/sjdgBpvlDs04giSn4dRmrYO58 CtzM6CEwkxkLxyJbG2SqG2M1A0EgEKR2JIY8hDljiUQ7WvUID8aP20Rof+4etG8T3bIX h/nkYu4af7+kSeBj3rIO7ZdrdCf3P1xqhQxkjvne9yvViPJyxH311gquKcD9ZBPKDnan R/g7XJ25Vc1Gs9CqeaSjqm8Rf7lApY02v/L5AlwpDsDVS7xD2Czekhj3uE14sHlry56M AKrsu+yz7ziXIqMyaDhsYBEKm91rCxpymZNf3T/P5bp6yvJ4kR2LCR9jSi3kUjrwm6gG Xh2Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKULvAukbJ17tEf2quHSzHri9Yg5mIHGYYHl5Gb0U+UZA7nZ8OKA u8OjwZuyZu6CmXSh6cK0hSuAjd+Eqx21obv09qgh9YFcv5k=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set8hd4fvOKkdkGABwzWU1xFvhW6TKcyjLTz363dvcKtd43l5PIzvX7CGoU5suxGdAmMgsh3IsjBAl+RRJJTfSIs=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:3ca:b0:3b9:a3c5:daf9 with SMTP id k10-20020a05622a03ca00b003b9a3c5daf9mr684300qtx.127.1675804795030; Tue, 07 Feb 2023 13:19:55 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2023 16:19:44 -0500
Message-ID: <CABNhwV3_C8treRiGwo=UOWjUB44UNcST3acKF7idZpH-PhbmxQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: IDR List <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000085533b05f422b52b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/EMxh48ikfX3gi3kHOx25jWW3dn0>
Subject: [Idr] 4 Byte extended community RFC 5668
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2023 21:20:00 -0000
Dear IDR experts I had a question related to 4 Byte AS extended community RFC 5668 which supports a 4 byte Global administrative field and a 2 byte local administrative field. RFC 8092 BGP Large community provides the support for 4 byte ASN encoding, 10 byte extended community in 3 4 byte fields x:y:z to provide extensibility for legacy 32 bit standard communities RFC 1997. It does appear a gap exists for RFC 5668 for 4 byte AS Global administrative field with local administrative field being able to support 4 octets as well for RT EC HO any LO 0x2 and route origin EC. Does anyone know of any spec or development in the works to support this feature. The focus of this draft below is on route leaks. Would this draft be able to provide extensibility to support 4 byte local administrative field for RT or Origin EC? https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-heitz-idr-wklc-05 Thanks Gyan -- <http://www.verizon.com/> *Gyan Mishra* *Network Solutions A**rchitect * *Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>* *M 301 502-1347*
- Re: [Idr] 4 Byte extended community RFC 5668 Jeffrey Haas
- [Idr] 4 Byte extended community RFC 5668 Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Idr] 4 Byte extended community RFC 5668 Gyan Mishra