Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rtc-hierarchical-rr-02.txt
"Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com> Tue, 31 May 2016 08:41 UTC
Return-Path: <jie.dong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3385812B02C for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 May 2016 01:41:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.647
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.647 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZXntw7qDcawU for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 May 2016 01:41:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E42C12B04E for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 May 2016 01:41:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CPX00908; Tue, 31 May 2016 08:41:52 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML412-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.73) by lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Tue, 31 May 2016 09:41:51 +0100
Received: from NKGEML515-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.169]) by nkgeml412-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.73]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Tue, 31 May 2016 16:41:44 +0800
From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
To: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rtc-hierarchical-rr-02.txt
Thread-Index: AQHRuxJIiqDaI2QYG0ik/WC8GBq63J/SuREA
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 08:41:43 +0000
Message-ID: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92774E83D60@NKGEML515-MBS.china.huawei.com>
References: <20160531075735.15200.47132.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160531075735.15200.47132.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.130.151.75]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A0B0206.574D4E51.024D, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.5.169, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: f5a10e942450913939980a9ce7266e32
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/FIDRu056N4CoXHenwtJlWJvuQvY>
Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rtc-hierarchical-rr-02.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 08:41:59 -0000
Hi all, There are some editorial changes in this new revision. And the authors would like to know the WG's opinion on the two potential solutions, so that some decision could be made in a future version. Comments and feedbacks are welcome. Best regards, Jie > -----Original Message----- > From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org > Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 3:58 PM > To: i-d-announce@ietf.org > Cc: idr@ietf.org > Subject: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rtc-hierarchical-rr-02.txt > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. > This draft is a work item of the Inter-Domain Routing of the IETF. > > Title : Extensions to RT-Constrain in Hierarchical Route > Reflection Scenarios > Authors : Jie Dong > Mach(Guoyi) Chen > Robert Raszuk > Filename : draft-ietf-idr-rtc-hierarchical-rr-02.txt > Pages : 6 > Date : 2016-05-31 > > Abstract: > The Route Target (RT) Constrain mechanism specified in RFC 4684 is > used to build a route distribution graph in order to restrict the > propagation of Virtual Private Network (VPN) routes. In network > scenarios where hierarchical route reflection (RR) is used, the > existing RT-Constrain mechanism cannot guarantee a correct route > distribution graph. This document describes the problem scenario and > proposes a solution to address the RT-Constrain issue in hierarchical > RR scenarios. > > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-rtc-hierarchical-rr/ > > There's also a htmlized version available at: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-rtc-hierarchical-rr-02 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-idr-rtc-hierarchical-rr-02 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > Idr mailing list > Idr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
- [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rtc-hierarchical… internet-drafts
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rtc-hierarch… Dongjie (Jimmy)