Re: [Idr] draft-jiang-idr-ts-flowspec-srv6-policy-07.txt

Hi Susan & EG

I support WG adoption of this draft.

We discussed this draft in detail this past March and my review of the
draft was to clearly to add the gaps exist in
“draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-path-redirect-11” which defines a path redirect
method and challenges that exist with that draft as it relates to SRv6,
which requires the introduction of a new mechanisms redirect-Ip EC + Color
EC with this draft for SRv6 policy.

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/HENTMEoiMJGmcMuVz7LTYclCSdw/

1) Do you agree with extending 8955 and 8956 to carry the

action bit [C] found for IPv4 and IPv6 found

draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-redirect-ip-02.txt

Yes

2) Do you agree with this document use of this feature

in addition to  draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-path-redirect

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-path-redirect/

Yes

3) Will this work help deployment of SRv6 networks?

 Yes this FS redirect feature will be very helpful for SRv6 networks
Kind Regards

Gyan
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 10:59 AM Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:

> This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for
> draft-jiang-idr-ts-flowspec-srv6-policy-07.txt
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jiang-idr-ts-flowspec-srv6-policy/
>
>
>
> During your discussion of this draft, please consider:
>
>
>
> 1) Do you agree with extending 8955 and 8956 to carry the
>
> action bit [C] found for IPv4 and IPv6 found
>
> draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-redirect-ip-02.txt
>
>
>
> Figure 1 : Local Administrator
>
>
>
> 0                   1
>
> 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5
>
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>
> |          Reserved           |C|
>
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>
>
>
> C = 0 – redirect original flow
>
> C = 1 – redirect copy of original flow
>
>
>
> This bit augments the Redirect to IP action in RFC8955
>
> And RFC8956.
>
>
>
> 2) Do you agree with this document use of this feature
>
> in addition to  draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-path-redirect
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-path-redirect/
>
>
>
> See the following thread for a discussion of this in March:
>
>  https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/HENTMEoiMJGmcMuVz7LTYclCSdw/
>
>
>
> 3) Will this work help deployment of SRv6 networks?
>
>
>
> We’ll discuss this draft at the IDR interim on 8/29/2022.
>
>
>
> Cheerily, Susan Hares
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>
-- 

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *

*Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>*

*M 301 502-1347*

Re: [Idr] draft-jiang-idr-ts-flowspec-srv6-policy-07.txt - (8/17/2022 to 8/31/2022