Re: [Idr] BGP Persistent Route Oscillation Solutions as WG item

John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net> Thu, 31 March 2011 07:26 UTC

Return-Path: <jgs@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: idr@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8645328C23D for <idr@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:26:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.547
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.547 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.052, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uyeW8upRA8m2 for <idr@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:26:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og102.obsmtp.com (exprod7og102.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.157]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA5E28C23E for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:26:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob102.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTZQtAt/kc492eVCGb9zXA67ZOxQB0QMT@postini.com; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:28:02 PDT
Received: from EMBX02-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::18fe:d666:b43e:f97e]) by P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::fc92:eb1:759:2c72%11]) with mapi; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:24:35 -0700
From: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
To: "idr@ietf.org List" <idr@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:26:06 -0700
Thread-Topic: [Idr] BGP Persistent Route Oscillation Solutions as WG item
Thread-Index: AcvvdK9r26Ud/el4TH+SbR4jTTlVkg==
Message-ID: <726E8DAC-A0ED-44A7-9D8D-0A55BA364B5B@juniper.net>
References: <1D23749D4168CC4D8B8652397B5F643204E57756@XMB-RCD-206.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <1D23749D4168CC4D8B8652397B5F643204E57756@XMB-RCD-206.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Idr] BGP Persistent Route Oscillation Solutions as WG item
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 07:26:26 -0000

Please send comments to the list by April 14, 2011.

I note there was some discussion of this on the list around May 10-12 2010, which wasn't resolved.  Folks may want to take a look at the archives.

--John
  
On Mar 30, 2011, at 11:34 AM, Alvaro Retana (aretana) wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> The 'BGP Persistent Route Oscillation Solutions' draft has been stable
> for quite some time; here's the latest version (no changes, just a
> refresh):
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-walton-bgp-route-oscillation-stop-04
> 
> I would like to request that this draft become a WG item.
> 
> As a reminder, I included the abstract below.
> 
> Thanks!!
> 
> Alvaro.
> 
> 
> Abstract
> 
>   In this document we present two sets of paths for an address prefix
>   that can be advertised by a BGP route reflector or confederation ASBR
>   to eliminate the MED-induced route oscillations in a network.  The
>   first set involves all the available paths, and would achieve the
>   same routing consistency as the full IBGP mesh.  The second set,
>   which is a subset of the first one, involves the neighbor-AS based
>   Group Best Paths, and would be sufficient to eliminate the MED-
>   induced route oscillations (subject to certain commonly adopted
>   topological constrains).
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr