Re: [Idr] WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy: IPR call and call for implementations

Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> Thu, 04 June 2020 20:53 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C06B3A0F57; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 13:53:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.225
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.225 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.276, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r-1P8MJPIJB2; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 13:53:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-100-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEFAB3A0F56; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 13:53:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=166.170.22.63;
From: "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com>
To: "'Eugene Bogomazov'" <eb@qrator.net>
Cc: "'idr@ietf. org'" <idr@ietf.org>, <draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy@ietf.org>
References: <017501d62b19$deaf5e60$9c0e1b20$@ndzh.com> <CAH1iCiqT7PPLbv6Mpg=4uvEj_mFP81oC52xXiSV9Gv_wUDsaRg@mail.gmail.com> <CANX+VdDm_cb5i3r+c9gjGHUS6_h5Dn+eMBE1rGhcWJt_8Everg@mail.gmail.com> <02af01d63a94$1c5ff5b0$551fe110$@ndzh.com> <CANX+VdAVqm-EYLRhpY5DtkOrn5-3mormshe29er8sEbi=aQnGA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANX+VdAVqm-EYLRhpY5DtkOrn5-3mormshe29er8sEbi=aQnGA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 16:53:34 -0400
Message-ID: <002101d63ab2$3746b9e0$a5d42da0$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0022_01D63A90.B036EEA0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQIGv78oqr4APBkLcETZ/gjdCKe0DgLrCFtcAihNUkwBhkBLGwFqJBJ4qCfDjOA=
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 200603-2, 06/03/2020), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/LVxpDyryrVxzDNqXUGWP80x6xzY>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy: IPR call and call for implementations
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2020 20:53:39 -0000

Eugene: 

 

Thanks for the information.  Just one question, what does BIRD support on Code 2, Subcode 8. 

 

I will start WG LC while I wait. 

 

Sue

 

From: Eugene Bogomazov [mailto:eb@qrator.net] 
Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 4:08 PM
To: Susan Hares
Cc: idr@ietf. org; draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy: IPR call and call for implementations

 

Susan:

We support BIRD 1.6.4 and BIRD 2.0.5  https://github.com/error2407/BGP_Open_Policy 
Examples of changes in configuration for both BIRD and FRR can be found in https://github.com/error2407/BGP_Open_Policy/blob/master/README.md 
All implementations support sending/receiving Role Capabilities and OTC attribute. Also they support strict_mode.
Role Mismatch is sending/receiving, however in BIRD this value (Code 2, Subcode 8) is already in use.
The only missing point is that we are not sending  "Connection Rejected" notification in either of the versions yet, however BGP session is correctly rejected.

And yes, we have tested BIRD and FRR between each other.

 

On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 8:18 PM Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:

Eugene: 

 

In checking, I realized that you mentioned BIRD 1.76 and 2.0 in your 5/17/2020 email.  With these two implementations (BIRD, FRR), we will be able to send draft-idr-bgp-open-policy to the IESG.  Would you please fill out the implementation information or send me the implementation information? 

 

The wiki page is at: 

https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy

 

 

Most important, do these 2 implementation interoperate in your tests?  

 

This evening, we’ll start the WG LC for this draft. 

 

Sue 

 

From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Eugene Bogomazov
Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2020 5:24 PM
To: Susan Hares; idr@ietf. org
Cc: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy: IPR call and call for implementations

 

I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft.

Currently we have two realizations for this draft: for BIRD 1.6 and BIRD 2.0. You can find them on https://github.com/error2407/BGP_Open_Policy. There was also a realization on FRR, but it was for the previous version of the draft and it'll take about 2 weeks to update it to the latest version of the text.

 

On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 11:55 PM Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com> wrote:

I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft or its predecessors-in-interest.

 

Brian

 

On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 5:35 PM Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:

This is an IPR Call for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-10.txt.

 

The authors should send in a IPR statement to the list – even if you have send in an IPR call during adoption.  

 

The WG LC will begin as soon as the all authors send in an IPR statement. 

 

Also, please send any information regarding implementations to the list. 

 

Cheers, Sue  

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr