Re: [Idr] draft-psarkar-idr-bgp-ls-node-admin-tag-extension - 2 Week WG Adoption call

Pushpasis Sarkar <psarkar@juniper.net> Thu, 01 October 2015 06:54 UTC

Return-Path: <psarkar@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DBF41AD182 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 23:54:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0VYOJeRmQ-MC for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 23:54:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0106.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.106]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEE441B2ACE for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 23:54:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from CY1PR05MB1980.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.162.216.26) by CY1PR05MB1977.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.162.216.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.280.20; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 06:54:23 +0000
Received: from CY1PR05MB1980.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.216.26]) by CY1PR05MB1980.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.216.26]) with mapi id 15.01.0280.017; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 06:54:23 +0000
From: Pushpasis Sarkar <psarkar@juniper.net>
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] draft-psarkar-idr-bgp-ls-node-admin-tag-extension - 2 Week WG Adoption call
Thread-Index: AQHQ/BYA0c4w62NIZE2jPR0KgkSJuA==
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 06:54:22 +0000
Message-ID: <DA7B9A09-CE6C-4498-A865-225AB59F11A5@juniper.net>
References: <013301d0ebf1$fb623f30$f226bd90$@ndzh.com> <20150929212332.GG5754@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150929212332.GG5754@pfrc.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/0.0.0.150911
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=psarkar@juniper.net;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [116.197.184.12]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; CY1PR05MB1977; 5:W8reKbEev1Im94Q2H0+lJp9mwyCBUspIE7OcYOQMRm4M4XTxKcOmHVpcPPt85GAeJjnOxQdu2oL99ZeCjeVW6Y/+htFp6tgsZJJzpQKmCJmBsGmtSv4fuj+5c9KLkKM8GFvLPzKnQ0Kr45XueJLOJA==; 24:f+VVk8fzfLiSya9SgdWUkk6/qVG9U9sLuAGH2Y4CDDMb8N0fCI8ORaRfS497ceyqsuHEr1bjum+NvON/WMoF40vOkrWKclWbb1QkKDk0UOU=; 20:XXTxAqsS1SUJ1RcKmDPDnY3nnhFSHMk8SYbWy2o0+Uav0aBkHQY+KUS3lgtqDAu06IrCdFC6jDlDKZew21YIYg==
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CY1PR05MB1977;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CY1PR05MB1977A1374C1856EF4EB1F4E3BC4C0@CY1PR05MB1977.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(520078)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001); SRVR:CY1PR05MB1977; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:CY1PR05MB1977;
x-forefront-prvs: 0716E70AB6
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(43544003)(479174004)(189002)(24454002)(199003)(377454003)(5001830100001)(102836002)(97736004)(40100003)(33656002)(5004730100002)(81156007)(5001860100001)(4001350100001)(4001540100001)(77096005)(122556002)(62966003)(5001770100001)(77156002)(15975445007)(82746002)(5001960100002)(106116001)(68736005)(5007970100001)(36756003)(92566002)(66066001)(86362001)(189998001)(99286002)(230783001)(76176999)(50986999)(105586002)(11100500001)(64706001)(19580405001)(54356999)(10400500002)(2950100001)(101416001)(46102003)(19580395003)(83716003)(87936001)(5008740100001)(5002640100001)(2900100001)(83506001)(106356001)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CY1PR05MB1977; H:CY1PR05MB1980.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <4D21672AA4E9414B97DFB0CE8BC21A1F@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 01 Oct 2015 06:54:22.8731 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY1PR05MB1977
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/LmJcpm9DJ5sQYdBdsEHLJP_GIP8>
Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>, "'John G. Scudder'" <jgs@bgp.nu>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-psarkar-idr-bgp-ls-node-admin-tag-extension - 2 Week WG Adoption call
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 06:54:28 -0000

Hi Jeff,

Thanks a lot for the comments. I will take care of these in the next version.

Regards,
-Pushpasis




On 9/30/15, 2:53 AM, "Idr on behalf of Jeffrey Haas" <idr-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of jhaas@pfrc.org> wrote:

>On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 01:56:12PM -0400, Susan Hares wrote:
>> This begins a 2 week WG Adoption call for
>> draft-psarkar-idr-bgp-ls-node-admin-tag-extension. 
>
>A bit late, but I also support adoption of this draft.
>
>Two minor comments:
>1. The -01 version looks like it was run through xml2rfc which decided to
>wedge the name a bit too compactly into the headers.  The authors should
>investigate the <title abbrev= mode, if so.
>2. The underlying BGP-LS draft is listed as an informative reference.  It
>seems like it should be normative.
>
>-- Jeff
>
>_______________________________________________
>Idr mailing list
>Idr@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr