Re: [Idr] Request for Feedfback on draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe - 1 week (6/14 to 6/20)
"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Thu, 15 June 2017 00:19 UTC
Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6840A12943B for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 17:19:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.946
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.946 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wPzVbekpgLqm for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 17:19:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-97-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EE041205D3 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 17:19:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=174.124.176.217;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: "'John G. Scudder'" <jgs@juniper.net>
Cc: 'idr wg' <idr@ietf.org>
References: <00f901d2e55b$71193df0$534bb9d0$@ndzh.com> <5F0C92B8-B32A-40B6-B5C7-5DD76C401510@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <5F0C92B8-B32A-40B6-B5C7-5DD76C401510@juniper.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 20:13:33 -0400
Message-ID: <018d01d2e56c$3a375860$aea60920$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_018E_01D2E54A.B3282960"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQFLcDzNqfnWqqHDBtJxYG1o72M2MgHl1WIeoyTJQ5A=
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/MOg_N4xO8LCotRJW2uZgKEfG6W8>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Request for Feedfback on draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe - 1 week (6/14 to 6/20)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 00:19:19 -0000
John: Thanks for adding that point. Sue From: John G. Scudder [mailto:jgs@juniper.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 7:41 PM To: Susan Hares Cc: idr wg Subject: Re: [Idr] Request for Feedfback on draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe - 1 week (6/14 to 6/20) One added point, reports of other implementations would be very helpful. Thanks, --John On Jun 14, 2017, at 6:13 PM, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote: The draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe-12.txt has 2 implementations from two different branches from Cisco. In the past some people have asked the chairs if this was sufficient to fulfill the IDR Working Group’s requirement for 2 implementations. The IDR chairs are planning to forward this document to the IESG based on the two cisco implementations (IOS-XR 6.0.2 and Cisco Nexus Switch (N9000/N3000 running NX-0S 7.0(3) 15(1) or greater). If you feel the IDR WG should require another implementation to meet the 2 implementation requirements, please respond to this list by 6/20/2017. If the chairs have not heard from the WG by 6/20, we will forward this draft to the IESG for publication. Sue Hares
- [Idr] Request for Feedfback on draft-ietf-idr-bgp… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] Request for Feedfback on draft-ietf-idr… John G. Scudder
- Re: [Idr] Request for Feedfback on draft-ietf-idr… Susan Hares