Re: [Idr] Are there IDR drafts the Grow WG needs completed quickly?

Job Snijders <job@ntt.net> Thu, 20 July 2017 08:42 UTC

Return-Path: <job@instituut.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D1C129B7F for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 01:42:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nVTmMskcwuBK for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 01:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-f173.google.com (mail-wr0-f173.google.com [209.85.128.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FF7B129B40 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 01:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-f173.google.com with SMTP id f21so11262591wrf.5 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 01:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=e5oFQaQX4YvZH7eftwlRZOUZqUwuTYoJahJWnHKpq8Q=; b=LfTVamqtXV3gbfIW8ExCzzlm5H2CTpMpICcWCPG4dAR3Q/uzm6lWIu9ruxSqtXEkb0 V/GtdxgooH9FIZ39S9ANM5psuqSFss20fk1imWirihLjKzoGa1JRZLcpYsPA8WEmP2In FZRGjkvqsuU3UA8YNlp50XlthVZanpqcZq+n3/31zx1tsd4piBbpVPah4vN/J0MPJxUq 4NMEkDS0LFhSMBRXqmzWges0iob87sc9tGYQ61lhjanfOKJZJKwo3WZkX3IQXM2HSdG/ 1OsKClwpCgCKkq5xfErpiN98z4cmJ8/EfmT/m+/xMCdDopNesYd1ljouURDA6lFiSySU SgpQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw111+1X0saJK3X61NVfeDNW2PtH1/JfTXl/SMbXkKbBTmz72eI8mz DWTWnk8XJ7TSI5sQ
X-Received: by 10.223.136.212 with SMTP id g20mr6364952wrg.96.1500540128823; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 01:42:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([2001:67c:370:128:454f:4:b926:9a31]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 93sm3748771wra.82.2017.07.20.01.42.07 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 20 Jul 2017 01:42:07 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 10:42:07 +0200
From: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>
To: Christopher Morrow <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
Cc: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org List" <idr@ietf.org>, "grow@ietf.org grow@ietf.org" <grow@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20170720084207.aprg44zv26y5wo3y@Vurt.local>
References: <001c01d3012d$d55f3920$801dab60$@ndzh.com> <CAL9jLaaqevUU8_20BERVrZ5P1xL7GNuhAcTrJT4Nm4NVaAYyzg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLaaqevUU8_20BERVrZ5P1xL7GNuhAcTrJT4Nm4NVaAYyzg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/MS4ia1E_bWlTZBK4Ssv82YQS700>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Are there IDR drafts the Grow WG needs completed quickly?
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 08:42:13 -0000

On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 10:33:04AM +0200, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:
> > As the IDR co-chairs sat in the grow meeting, we heard of an IDR
> > draft that was so long in becoming an RFC that the Grow authors took
> > another approach (which was less desired).
> 
> I'm unsure what draft this is? this might be the gshut draft?  

GROW's draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut had a dependency on
draft-ietf-idr-reserved-extended-communities which related to
draft-ietf-idr-as4octet-extcomm-generic-subtype - eventually this was
resolved by just working with RFC 1997 well-known communities.

Kind regards,

Job