[Idr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4271 (3031)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 15 November 2011 01:48 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B45D611E8106 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:48:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.536
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.536 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.064, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PfUpoHxeOejt for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:48:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5204711E80CC for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:48:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 15093B1E003; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:42:56 -0800 (PST)
To: yakov@juniper.net, tony.li@tony.li, skh@nexthop.com, stbryant@cisco.com, adrian@olddog.co.uk, shares@ndzh.com, jgs@juniper.net
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20111115014256.15093B1E003@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:42:56 -0800
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 22:03:05 -0800
Cc: kireeti@juniper.net, idr@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Idr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4271 (3031)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 01:48:05 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4271,
"A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4271&eid=3031

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net>

Section: 9.1.2

Original Text
-------------
The Phase 2 decision function is blocked from running while the Phase
3 decision function is in process.

Corrected Text
--------------
The Phase 3 decision function is blocked from running while the Phase
2 decision function is in process.

Notes
-----
I believe that is what was intended; the text as is confuses me no end.

Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC4271 (draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-26)
--------------------------------------
Title               : A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)
Publication Date    : January 2006
Author(s)           : Y. Rekhter, Ed., T. Li, Ed., S. Hares, Ed.
Category            : DRAFT STANDARD
Source              : Inter-Domain Routing
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG