[Idr] [Errata Rejected] RFC1997 (4576)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sun, 03 April 2016 13:06 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5293412D555; Sun, 3 Apr 2016 06:06:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.932
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.932 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h9jNuGigyiS7; Sun, 3 Apr 2016 06:06:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D6D612D56D; Sun, 3 Apr 2016 06:06:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id C89EB180014; Sun, 3 Apr 2016 06:05:38 -0700 (PDT)
To: gjoko.stamenkov@mikasta.com, pst@cisco.com, rchandra@cisco.com, tli@skat.usc.edu
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20160403130538.C89EB180014@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2016 06:05:38 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/NplV4xnhApvHQoiZW6nAgeKYZRY>
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, iesg@ietf.org, idr@ietf.org
Subject: [Idr] [Errata Rejected] RFC1997 (4576)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2016 13:06:31 -0000

The following errata report has been rejected for RFC1997,
"BGP Communities Attribute".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=1997&eid=4576

--------------------------------------
Status: Rejected
Type: Editorial

Reported by: Gjoko Stamenkov <gjoko.stamenkov@mikasta.com>
Date Reported: 2016-01-02
Rejected by: Alvaro Retana (IESG)

Section: GLOBAL

Original Text
-------------
Well-known Communities

   The following communities have global significance and their
   operations shall be implemented in any community-attribute-aware BGP
   speaker.

NO_EXPORT (0xFFFFFF01)
         All routes received carrying a communities attribute
         containing this value MUST NOT be advertised outside a BGP
         confederation boundary (a stand-alone autonomous system that
         is not part of a confederation should be considered a
         confederation itself).
NO_ADVERTISE (0xFFFFFF02)
         All routes received carrying a communities attribute
         containing this value MUST NOT be advertised to other BGP
         peers.
NO_EXPORT_SUBCONFED (0xFFFFFF03)
         All routes received carrying a communities attribute
         containing this value MUST NOT be advertised to external BGP
         peers (this includes peers in other members autonomous
         systems inside a BGP confederation).

Corrected Text
--------------
Well-known Communities

   The following communities have global significance and their
   operations shall be implemented in any community-attribute-aware BGP
   speaker.

NO_EXPORT (0xFFFFFF01)
         All routes received carrying a communities attribute
         containing this value MUST NOT be advertised to external BGP
         peers (this includes peers in other members autonomous
         systems inside a BGP confederation).  
NO_ADVERTISE (0xFFFFFF02)
         All routes received carrying a communities attribute
         containing this value MUST NOT be advertised to other BGP
         peers.
NO_EXPORT_SUBCONFED (0xFFFFFF03)
         All routes received carrying a communities attribute
         containing this value MUST NOT be advertised outside a BGP
         confederation boundary (a stand-alone autonomous system that
         is not part of a confederation should be considered a
         confederation itself).

Notes
-----
Definitions of NO_EXPORT and NO_EXPORT_SUBCONFED are interchanged in the original text.

=== (Alvaro Retana) ===

After some research and discussion with the WG [1], I'm rejecting this report.

[1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/current/msg15364.html
 --VERIFIER NOTES-- 
   After some research and discussion with the WG [1], I'm rejecting this report.

[1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/current/msg15364.html


--------------------------------------
RFC1997 (no draft string recorded)
--------------------------------------
Title               : BGP Communities Attribute
Publication Date    : August 1996
Author(s)           : R. Chandra, P. Traina, T. Li
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Inter-Domain Routing
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG