IETF Logo Mail Archive

draft-ietf-idr-route-damp-00-preview-01

Curtis Villamizar <curtis@brookfield.ans.net> Thu, 09 October 1997 06:24 UTC

Received: from merit.edu (merit.edu [198.108.1.42]) by nic.merit.edu (8.8.4/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA13366 for <idr-archive@nic.merit.edu>; Thu, 9 Oct 1997 02:24:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by merit.edu (8.8.7/8.8.5) id CAA06509 for idr-outgoing; Thu, 9 Oct 1997 02:17:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from brookfield.ans.net (brookfield-ef0.brookfield.ans.net [204.148.1.20]) by merit.edu (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA06505 for <idr@merit.edu>; Thu, 9 Oct 1997 02:17:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from brookfield.ans.net (localhost.brookfield.ans.net [127.0.0.1]) by brookfield.ans.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA21963; Thu, 9 Oct 1997 02:16:17 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199710090616.CAA21963@brookfield.ans.net>
To: yakov@cisco.com
cc: curtis@ans.net, idr@merit.edu
Reply-To: curtis@ans.net
Subject: draft-ietf-idr-route-damp-00-preview-01
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 1997 02:16:11 -0400
From: Curtis Villamizar <curtis@brookfield.ans.net>
Sender: owner-idr@merit.edu
Precedence: bulk

Yakov,

Any objection to my using the name draft-ietf-idr-route-damp-00 for
the route flap damping draft?  It's supposed to be a WG output to use
draft-ietf-idr- so I thought I'd ask.

The preview is at:

  http://engr.ans.net/route-damp/

If there are no objections about using the name or immediate comments
about the content, I'll remove the -preview-01 from the number and
submit the text and ps to the RFC editor.

Curtis

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email