Re: [Idr] draft-dong-idr-node-target-ext-comm-05.txt - WG Adoption and IPR call (9/27 to 10/11/2022) - Extended an Additional week to 10/18/2022

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Wed, 19 October 2022 22:01 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B60C1524D6 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 15:01:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n_6IBXUuj7rg for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 15:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62a.google.com (mail-ej1-x62a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AB72C14CF13 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 15:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62a.google.com with SMTP id q9so43195791ejd.0 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 15:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vdJ0AVy6QmuHN/1Hd6j8rmLoKind0iruihxLJ6Xu8Z4=; b=MLMN+FkjmBDM7IRWtVQcLBLEdvwQTpGCr6xy4/grw3P3bo5XhFZ+oRmPNjGwhmCwVW 50Nnv0TGO4wQxp8hJsuPJq/oCFHL2+kSbYKWZ5rUeJaC80uIB9E09s9iEDkoty073LWc x1triLLgOVKtpVJyYaLLztJZxIwk6iX3Q8coRiEEA0QxjR3NchjcXOu50ZonrDvKinyt MODUqZawx18B/CmsVlv5T4RP40jlHA5V5ePz+Sy2VIK3lUfNEFFNbKqJJP9UHR0cmPKw YcnR4rg9/X6yT20rXDKbQTL0JpiMC26vV21ntWMHYHM6ZvU3Gb2GeZI90ft3RbHlSwWO w0DQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=vdJ0AVy6QmuHN/1Hd6j8rmLoKind0iruihxLJ6Xu8Z4=; b=Tp4nnyOQ0GXqq7bZ8/5RtaC7OGGhCl5DWtoD73bDQKloGGWe/ok8OiosjQGY4qUSFk auEwhnHMgPLWzNDr4fPaNjfsIgR997ffKEG2ZLPLIBZy0AwCRR8lHQh1swnybrXC24HF 8ZW5luVjJoS/2SGBsL2XCpvhJ6j5ZUN/b8G8DBMx25wpIOmA9XpcHdMz2C0P4uSXEmQ5 9RySRC/DBTYemv1IA723WFtug7UbwYzME35v1OxjUAXNeETtCQam511VEBbCmBd5k8kd tl/IuhH+qxDCbVMuFtp+W4MW674lqdVnQl33g6YgAxOdy8K0a8wFd3WxLAH7z9HcLCdH sy/g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1webm0Xd+DR3c8IgxFwBPyFvTvWVYoXbsdgF1mjjuSdk81oW6R 4fHWwBCVde2yr+4xkETVRKGjr5JhoruUQGQgx64mV2KrU6hONA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4n8WH75LVnW62+B+11lVXsM6id7l8QMnuu5HviJsfVzvq+PXslXUyOoWRhgRgrU6oAtyxuSCqgGaVaNgu68QU=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:728e:b0:78d:f5c2:70d3 with SMTP id dt14-20020a170907728e00b0078df5c270d3mr8418854ejc.506.1666216897976; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 15:01:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <BYAPR08MB4872FFB2ED1C82409C861369B3229@BYAPR08MB4872.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <BL0PR05MB565229580BB9F0011090EF11D4289@BL0PR05MB5652.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <2f4ca371565d4be1a4a20b15b97cd9a1@huawei.com> <BL0PR05MB5652697A256A6E212FA37BC3D42B9@BL0PR05MB5652.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <80D68AF7-5826-4459-80B5-3673C72730E2@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <80D68AF7-5826-4459-80B5-3673C72730E2@pfrc.org>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 00:02:29 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMFJJVUOjX0bUkyMrJO=DGWKYV8Xstc=DOYcgUH8pHfiDg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
Cc: "Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" <zzhang=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Sue Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000052b46505eb6a5a7c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/P7hVLQ_sY8eIHEXy2HRoUQ1ltYE>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-dong-idr-node-target-ext-comm-05.txt - WG Adoption and IPR call (9/27 to 10/11/2022) - Extended an Additional week to 10/18/2022
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 22:01:43 -0000

Jeff,

On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 11:53 PM Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> wrote:

> Jeffrey,
>
> On Oct 18, 2022, at 11:05 PM, Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang <
> zzhang=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
> The red text is not correct. RFC 6514 already used <address:0> RT to
> target routes to a node, and as you say in the purple text the RT
> mechanism can be extended to non-VPN.
>
>
> It's my understanding that the RFC 6514 VRF Route Import Extended
> Community is, as labeled, for VRF scope.
>
> The proposal here is that this is node scoped, and thus addressed toward a
> node by its BGP Identifer (router-id).
>



The way I understand it by reading Jie's use case that this VRF scoped too.
It could be nodes scoped and VRF scoped.



Dongjie (Jimmy)
Tue, Oct 18, 5:53 AM (1 day ago)
to me, idr@ietf.org, Susan, Gunter

Hi Robert,



Please note that the use case is to distribute the information to a VRF on
specific set of nodes, which are a subset of nodes which are provisioned
with that VPN.




Thx,
R.