[Idr] Re: [BGP SA] draft-sa-idr-bgp-srv6-mpls-transport-iw-02 (7/24/2026 to 8/14/2026)

[Luay Jalil <[e-mail]>]

Hi Sue,
I support the adoption of this draft. SRv6 interworking with MPLS is
important to us in our network(s)

Regards,
Luay

On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 4:44 AM Susan Hares <[e-mail]> wrote:

> This begins a 3- week WG Adoption call for
> draft-sa-idr-bgp-srv6-mpls-transport-iw-02 (7/24/2026 to 8/14/2026).   The
> reason for the 3-week WG adoption call is the summer vacation in August.
>
>
>
> The authors should respond to this email with an email indicating if they
> know of any IPR relating to this draft.
>
>
>
> This draft defines the BGP extensions required to provide transport
> interworking between SRv6 and MPLS in SRv6 deployment.     This document
> defines a new TLV called "SRv6 Transport TLV" of the   BGP Prefix-SID
> Attribute to announce SRv6 SID with prefixes of BGP-LU SAFI.  SRv6 SID is
> encoded in "SRv6 Transport TLV" exactly like SRv6 Service SID TLV
> [RFC9252].  This document uses the TLV to signal  End.DTM and End.DTM46.
>
>
>
> There are 2 implementations in progress on this draft.
>
>
>
> In the WG consideration, please consider:
>
> 1) Does the technology correctly provide transport interworking between
> SRv6 and MPLS?
>
> 2) Is this technology useful for SRv6 and MPLS deployments?
>
> 3) Do you have any concerns on this technology?
>
>
>
> Cheers, Sue
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>