IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-scudder-idr-rfc3392-bis-00

Chandrashekhar Appanna <achandra@cisco.com> Fri, 23 May 2008 01:56 UTC

Return-Path: <idr-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: idr-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-idr-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D7D3A6C00; Thu, 22 May 2008 18:56:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: idr@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4194B3A6C00 for <idr@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 May 2008 18:56:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tVD5kET1JE5f for <idr@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 May 2008 18:56:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-3.cisco.com (sj-iport-3.cisco.com [171.71.176.72]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D27F3A6B7A for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 May 2008 18:56:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,526,1204531200"; d="scan'208";a="71477820"
Received: from sj-dkim-1.cisco.com ([171.71.179.21]) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 22 May 2008 18:56:23 -0700
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (sj-core-5.cisco.com [171.71.177.238]) by sj-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m4N1uN4o010134; Thu, 22 May 2008 18:56:23 -0700
Received: from cisco.com (pita.cisco.com [171.71.177.199]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m4N1uNRJ022572; Fri, 23 May 2008 01:56:23 GMT
Received: (from achandra@localhost) by cisco.com (8.8.8-Cisco List Logging/8.8.8) id SAA27120; Thu, 22 May 2008 18:53:21 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 18:53:21 -0700
From: Chandrashekhar Appanna <achandra@cisco.com>
To: "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net>
Message-ID: <20080523015321.GF27385@cisco.com>
References: <200805221209.m4MC9Sx77651@magenta.juniper.net> <9354152D-3E60-4B56-9429-578B58F01728@juniper.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9354152D-3E60-4B56-9429-578B58F01728@juniper.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1069; t=1211507783; x=1212371783; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim1004; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=achandra@cisco.com; z=From:=20Chandrashekhar=20Appanna=20<achandra@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[Idr]=20Fwd=3A=20New=20Version=20Notifi cation=20for=20draft-scudder-idr-rfc3392-bis-00 |Sender:=20; bh=KxhLUVmX4qLOLotxYgCO3ArJIDnosnLbl0880EPcpVA=; b=lYRr27/Dd9R4G0p+Rj/RRKEsICLsNF2PZnKY7S0Sr7v7S3/7vg1QKfZxQo FGpa4Sw8d0dZog5htPGAQT3QiW/ICOS4+hp/7UJGMxddiiN1c/tiUW5WxjP0 5sRbqmPZ3xaU4dRuGPv+tHeSFM0P5W/ZBoy41XdNFWpbsbeNZSk1A=;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-1; header.From=achandra@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim1004 verified; );
Cc: Yakov Rekhter <yakov@juniper.net>, idr <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-scudder-idr-rfc3392-bis-00
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: idr-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: idr-bounces@ietf.org

On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 08:44:05PM -0400, John G. Scudder wrote:
> On May 22, 2008, at 8:09 AM, Yakov Rekhter wrote:
> > Based on the received responses your document is accepted as an IDR
> > WG item. Please resubmit it as draft-ietf-idr-rfc3392bis-00.txt
> 
> Done.  The submitted version is the same as draft-scudder-idr-rfc3392- 
> bis-00.txt other than title and date; I'll submit an update to reflect  
> WG comments shortly.  (So if you sent me a comment and don't see it  
> reflected, don't worry.)
> 
> My impression is that we don't really have WG consensus regarding  
> whether the error subcode name should be left as "Unsupported  
> Capability", or renamed "Required Capability Missing" or similar.   
> Lacking consensus I'm inclined to err on the side of leaving it  

  I agree with that point of view... leave it alone.

  Chandra.

> alone.  I'd welcome any further input on this.
>

> --John
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email