Tracking the discussion on the spec
Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com> Wed, 11 September 2002 12:03 UTC
Received: from trapdoor.merit.edu (trapdoor.merit.edu [198.108.1.26]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA05334 for <idr-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 08:03:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) id 06CB791379; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 08:02:16 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: idr-outgoing@trapdoor.merit.edu
Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix, from userid 56) id 7690D912C8; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 08:01:46 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: idr@trapdoor.merit.edu
Received: from segue.merit.edu (segue.merit.edu [198.108.1.41]) by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7027C912C7 for <idr@trapdoor.merit.edu>; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 08:01:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) id 4F7EF5DE36; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 08:01:39 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: idr@merit.edu
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [147.28.0.62]) by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20D255DD92 for <idr@merit.edu>; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 08:01:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62] helo=127.0.0.1) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 17p6Bd-000ELy-00 for idr@merit.edu; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 05:01:38 -0700
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 19:00:19 +0200
From: Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.51) Personal
Reply-To: Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <976223959.20020910190019@psg.com>
To: idr@merit.edu
Subject: Tracking the discussion on the spec
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-idr@merit.edu
Precedence: bulk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Folks- Regarding how the discussion on the list regarding the spec is organized, I'd like to suggest that a list of issues is maintained and periodically posted to the WG (with the latest ver potentially published on the web somewhere). Each issue brought up in the WG should be put on this list. Information regarding each item on the list should be sufficient to understand its nature, what was the WG consensus regarding it with required pointers to messages, quotes, or new text. Periodic posting to the WG mailing list should ensure that there are no dropped packets (we're all human) and that the WG consensus is properly reflected and documented. The list may be maintained either by the WG chairs or by a volunteer who works closely with them. Another suggestion would be to explicitly verify consensus in the cases where the discussion stalls and the agreement is not clear. Again periodic posting of the issue list should help ensure that we don't drop things here. Thanks a lot. -- Alex
- Tracking the discussion on the spec Alex Zinin
- Re: Tracking the discussion on the spec Yakov Rekhter