IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-large-community-05.txt

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Thu, 27 October 2016 13:08 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DADE912949F for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 06:08:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.952
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.952 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.431, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WA6qRHgb4oPn for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 06:08:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AEA0129449 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 06:08:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1660; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1477573683; x=1478783283; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=TXkZAqLSbbQRWkWE1yeKQt+7yQiPP1EJdEMVbF8qahM=; b=ao1BkDDi4ecnxMGuW9wXSu2YtWFIk6wg6WuIJsHiO1diFKef7FPd+Gzq mBQ6a/TRcEBdy3BQkMIqN4G0MK1qc4D7S76Lj8ahjD3kWVFEWS8sOpwYZ zIoPeNBVmtJ7eJEHtdgCoi0MdCnRJjgD/HUz7IZGwsXT2Hp/P+m4bz/jg 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AUAQBK+xFY/5xdJa1bGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgyoBAQEBAR1YfQeNMJZ/lD+CBxwLhXsCGoFjPxQBAgEBAQEBAQFiKIRjAQEEAQEBIBE6CxACAQgYAgImAgICJQsVEAIEAQ0FFIhADrJRjHoBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXBYEHiguER4MEglsBBI5Ki0wBkCGQBI0LhAABHjZfhQlyh1aBCQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,404,1473120000"; d="scan'208";a="162597434"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Oct 2016 13:08:02 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (xch-rtp-013.cisco.com [64.101.220.153]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u9RD82cd014642 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:08:02 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 09:08:01 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 09:08:01 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>, "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-large-community-05.txt
Thread-Index: AQHSL7ywsnz8goa3QkC7xxMNUyw0V6C8LUBfgABFOwD//9RSAA==
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:08:01 +0000
Message-ID: <D43773E7.85C0A%acee@cisco.com>
References: <147750904648.2927.9899493365277493754.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20161026191854.GD37101@Vurt.local> <011701d23045$f59009e0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <20161027114418.GT37101@Vurt.local>
In-Reply-To: <20161027114418.GT37101@Vurt.local>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.200]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <F911EC44A13483439F0841ECDDC16CF4@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/TWiGbk91_8MOdLugK6BhumgFfjo>
Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-large-community-05.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:08:08 -0000

Hi Job, Tom, 

On 10/27/16, 7:44 AM, "Idr on behalf of Job Snijders"
<idr-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of job@ntt.net> wrote:

>Hi Tom,
>
>On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:31:32PM +0100, t.petch wrote:
>> a minor administrative point; the RFC Editor commonly imposes a
>> constraint of five names on the first page, and this list has now grown
>> to six.  A common practice is to have just one name on the front, that
>> of the pen-holder, and list the others at the back, differentiating, at
>> the back, between those who have made a major contribution and those who
>> have not.  Cutting out one from six may be more problematic:-(
>
>This is not a problem. Looking at the last 1000 published RFCs, roughly
>3% of RFCs have more than 5 authors listed. If anything, it will be
>something between the RFC Editor and the Authors of this draft.

I know that as OSPF chair I’ve asked for exceptions to this rule when we
believe all the authors have made a substantive contribution.

Thanks,
Acee




>
>Thanks for your concern!
>
>Kind regards,
>
>Job
>
>_______________________________________________
>Idr mailing list
>Idr@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email